Rock N Roll... THE DEVILS MUSIC!!!

Here are the things these retarRAB find as evidence of a Satanic connection.

-Some kind of an association with/or admiration for Aleister Crowley, who was an occultist, but not a Satanist.
-Stupid coincidences.
-Urban legenRAB and myths that have been debunked.
-Quotes that can easly be interpreted in different ways. When Hendrix, Santana, Black Sabbath and Ginger Baker talk about "being posssessed" on stage does that mean they are actually demon possessed? Um, THEY TOOK A LOT OF DRUGS. Getting possessed can also just be a term for really getting into it.
-When artists like Madonna say they are full of demons, they must be talking about actual demons and not personal problems which are often called personal demons.
-When artists talk about the power of music, it's always interpreted as being something supernatural, how ****ing retarded.
-If a rock artist has a religious experience, it's Satan. Santana claims to be visited by Metatron, an ANGEL. Yep he's a Satan worshiper.
-Any reference to hell is taken as Satanic, like Hotel California, which is supposed to be pro hell? These people dont know anything, whatever place that song is about, it dosen't show it in a positive light.
-Songs with Satanic themes are always interpreted to be pro Satan. Sabbath and Maiden only have a few songs about Satan and hell, and they're just singing about it, not glorifying it.
-Drug users are instantly Satanic because drugs open them up to the "demon world".
-Homosexuals like Elton John are consistantly called sexual deviants with some kind of evil agenda.
-Any references to Hinduism or any other non Christian religion is considered Satanic. They even say Krishna is actually Satan and My Sweet Lord is a Satanic song because it's about Krishna.
-Quoting artists like David Bowie and Kurt Cobain, who are notorious for saying and doing things for the sake of being provocative.
-Backmasking. The most retarded anti rock music argument there is.
-Criticizing Christianity is automatically Satanic.
-When stupid kiRAB murder people because of music, it's always the music's fault, it's not because they make their own choices.
-KiRAB are angry because of the angry music they listen to, they don't listen to it because they're angry.
-If a performer is very energetic on stage, it must be demon posession.
-When artists say they "sold their soul to the devil" its always taken literally. :laughing:

Few of these artists downright said they worshipped Satan. Maybe because they don't?

These videos are so full of ridiculous bullcrap.

Elvis was NOT born on the same year Robert Johnson died, he was born on 1935 which was before Johnson even started recording, Johnson died in 38. They both died on August 16? Whoa, that can't just be a coincidence.
 
Hah i was sitting back thinking that. All made with basic HTML from about 10 years ago.

No wonder no one here is on there site, they need to update.
 
I still maintain that if Satan was any smart, he would have picked a cooler animal than goats. The main argument for Satan liking them is their horns, right?
 
Rock n' Roll was branded "devil music" because the first people to play it were African-Americans. It's that simple. White, racist America.

And just so you understand, this wasn't the first time. Swing music earned a negative reuptation for "getting the kiRAB all hooped up" because bandleaders were usually black.
 
I think it's ignorance at it's best. The people who claim that it's "The Devil's Music" most likely don't understand the music in its entirety so then they make outrageous accusations. It's funny because the more people that are claiming "It's the devil's music" the more the artist there complaining about gets/makes out of it. Has anyone noticed that?
 
No but seriously, I'm watching the second part of that documentary right now, and it's really not a well presented argument. Their logic is completely flawed and supported with almost nothing, except some show and videos excerpts, supposedly compiled by an (an, one, singular) ex rock star I've never heard of. If I handed in an essay like that in an University writing class, the prof would have failed me.

Their argument against "music can solve violence and doesn't cause it" is "well, the Colurabine killers listened to that kind of music, it must mean that music causes violence". Based on that fallacy: I enjoy the Carter Family, voice, so I must be a 70 something lady from Arkansas who goes to church twice a week? Or I'm from Quebec, hence I must love Celine Dion?

First of all, these guys were sociopath: that was the problem. I used to listen to Rammsteinn, I never shot anyone because of that. And bringing Marilyn Manson's into the argument is just pointless because the guy was always just a really smart guy trying to sell an act he knew would grab attention. He's Hard-Core Madonna. The Colurabine shooters were not musicians, so you can't use them as an argument either. They did not want to have faith, listened to heavy metal, hence heavy metal is un-Christian because of 2 people?

If they'd had a hobby... such as, I don't know, playing music, they would have been too busy to plan a mass murder.

I don't want to watch the rest of it, it's a waste of time...
 
people that claim anything to be the devil's music are just worried that people might actually develop opinions, something religions would hate
 
These guys should be put in a small room, surrounded by speakers and get blasted by some black metal.

That would teach them not to screw with Satan anymore :laughing:

For all we know, they might actually be possessed when they are out:bowdown:
 
Back
Top