Rip cn???

I'm with iKiller now. I made a dumb mistake and tbh if I was the staff members involved in this, (but there was no closing or locking of threads or any of that argument) I would have banned the guy who did it too and I would not of re-enabled him. You broke a rule in the "Breaking these rules can and will get you banned" section, and you have been banned. End of story. I'm happy iKiller handled it this way and gave me a chance to explain myself and to re-enable me. I don't care what any of you think. Supervisor helped too. That's what I think. Think what you want.
 
Is that the latest chant of you puss Canuks these days? Grow some balls maple boy.

The opinions expressed by Idol, as an effect of his mental senility, or not, are to be regarded as just that. Idol's opinions. It is not to be taken as a reflection of the behavioral norm of most Canadians.

I, for example, would gladly bury my shoe in someone's face granted they piss me off enough. What's a fight without a fight?
 
Name one good thing you came out with from this thread.

I came out with a better understanding of how CN staff decide to ban individuals because they prioritize a(n) (irrational) rule breaking offense over the understanding of a sincere member's situation. As soon as Champo was banned I pm'ed him to get a better understanding of the proceedings (an ability 99% of your entire staff apparently lack) and he was extremely pissed off. Way to actually care for your members as a family.

By the way, if your life is unbearably busy to the point of not being able to reason with a situation fully before acting upon retarded impulses, you shouldn't be running a tracker.
In the words of Mr. Pink: "The words 'Too fucking busy', shouldn't be in a [staffer's] dictionary."

EDIT: Champo, there's really no need to bend over backwards. CN staff insist they're not an elitist site, but then they go ahead and behave this way to what is clearly a nice/reasonable person, based on an elitist rule. Sugarcoat it anyway you want to, but let's call spades, spades.

EDIT2: Supervisor, you said if this were any other tracker, this entire flame-fest/ordeal/argument/bashing wouldn't have gone down. Name me one other tracker that would have behaved similarly in this situation, and you'll have a better understanding of why there's a lot of hate.
 
threat lol

Cabalo said:
Not much to add to my previous post, but seems to me CN has its days counted.

For how long have you been saying that again? It's been almost 2 years mate, your predictions have been failing all along apparently.
 
I can and will do it anytime I want, it's none of your business how CN is run AFAIK.

And interesting how you talk as if you had ever been an important piece in how FST evolved to get where it is today, prolly the most visited forum in this small BT world. I got news for you though, you didn't do anything to help it reaching this point, so I'm not sure whether you can add such ton to your post. The arrogant ton of someone who actually succeeded in making this site what it is today. It doesn't suit your position, so drop it.
Now you really hurt my feelings. And here I was feeling an important part on what made FST become what it is today, spreading it all over the board at every possible chance, bragging in IRC, and now, without any mercy, you annihilate my dreams. :(
I will run to my corner and hide now. Like a dog on a leash.
 
I could say something disparaging about the choice of words but I won't.:unsure:

Also enough of these "look what is happening on x site " threads .They only have relevance to people already on those sites and therefore unless there are larger issues involved like a crooked staff or something should probably be discussed exclusively there .
I mean this way all you get is either trolls looking to randomly bad mouth anything or anyone or actual members apparently too gutless to say what they truly think hopefully to some positive effect where it should be said on the actual site .

One thing it does point out is this will likely to become the norm with sites begging for donations.Just way to many sites out there to compete with specially 0day racers.
 
No matter how you want to phrase it, or sugarcoat the decision backing it up with "CN's rules", nothing convinces me it wasn't a petty move to disable the guy.
The thread was open for 2 and a half days, you and other mods at cn were aware of its existence, you even said it was ok to keep it open, and all of the sudden he is disabled.

Why don't you show some coherence, and leave him alone? After all, he was told by a dog on a leash to harass us (the mods) to close the thread. He PM'ed every single one of us and got the same reply. We explicitly said in public we are not going to close/trash this thread (you guys at CN should know this by now), so blame it on us! Me, TrueSounds and Rart.

What was done to champo101 was done out of frustration. Man up, assume your mistake, and let him stay, if he still wants to. That would be called good PR.

Not that I care.
 
What idol said.

I can not see whats wrong about telling our users we are changing servers and that therefore we do need some extra cash to pay the bills. Enough with the dumbass attitude already.
 
Did I use the word 'donate' even once? :ermm:
//Edit: in terms of ways of being helpful towards the site, that is. Donating is not the only way of helping out ya know.

Do yer bit by seeding stuff you download, or help others on IRC or forums. That counts towards helping the site as well.
Merely pitching in towards server costs is just one way of 'helping out'.

It was a fair assumption considering this thread is about money problems, and your first two sentences were on topic about members needing to donate money. Don't know what preaching that you think everyone should help on IRC and follow the general site rules has to do with CN failing

I'm closing this thread

NO WAY IN HELL BOY

On an unrelated note, bumrocks is still a little cunt.

should rename thread 'lets all state obvious truths'.
 
No matter how you want to phrase it, or sugarcoat the decision backing it up with "CN's rules", nothing convinces me it wasn't a petty move to disable the guy.
The thread was open for 2 and a half days, you and other mods at cn were aware of its existence, you even said it was ok to keep it open, and all of the sudden he is disabled.

Why don't you show some coherence, and leave him alone? After all, he was told by a dog on a leash to harass us (the mods) to close the thread. He PM'ed every single one of us and got the same reply. We explicitly said in public we are not going to close/trash this thread (you guys at CN should know this by now), so blame it on us! Me, TrueSounds and Rart.

What was done to champo101 was done out of frustration. Man up, assume your mistake, and let him stay, if he still wants to. That would be called good PR.

Not that I care.

The rule has been in there since forever. I did not ban him, as I told him, because I know he didn't mean to bash CN, and as he said himself, he was not aware all the dickheads were gonna bash the site (he didn't use the term dickheads). So there you go, now you know why I didn't ban him myself. The rule is there though, so I could have done it as someone else ended up doing anyway.
 
Back
Top