In article ,
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote:
[attributions mucked up]
Restaurants have the right to post signs. I think that would come under
"Freedom of speech". However, just because a restaurant posts a sign
that clearly violates the law, doesn't mean that they have changed the
existing laws.
The incident took place in California, and thus was covered under three
laws, according to my exhaustive research (two minutes in Google):
http://www.legalzoom.com/us-law/equal-rights/right-refuse-service
Not only is there the Federal Civil Rights Act and the Americans with
Disabilities Act, but:
"California's Unruh Civil Rights Act makes it illegal to discriminate
against individuals based on unconventional dress or sexual preference.
In the 1960s, the Unruh Civil Rights Act was interpreted to provide
broad protection from arbitrary discrimination by business owners. Cases
decided during that era held that business owners could not
discriminate, for example, against hippies, police officers,
homosexuals, or Republicans, solely because of who they were. "
So, I would say that they couldn't bounce her for being a reviewer, but
could for writing negative reviews of restaurants owned by partners.
I did read of a restaurant that refused to serve police officers. I
guess one had come in and busted a customer, so after that, they refused
to serve them. It wasn't in California, though.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]