republicans and conservatives, why do you fear lowering health costs if you can keep...

kingcrab2879

New member
...your current health plan? Dont you like the idea of saving money if people have a PUBLIC option for health care? It seems logical to have a govt based option if it brings costs down for everyone. If your plan is fine you can keep it, so why not encourage a competitive option?

If the govt passes a health plan, you will see private insurers either losing millions of customers or lowering their costs to compete with the new public health plan. Competition is good for everyone, right?

I endorse 100% the govt desire to provide a cost-effective option BUT I am concerned about DETAILS in the govt plan.

Here's what I want to hear/see detail answers about before they pass it:
-closing loopholes of pricing & costs--- like how will they monitor how many subscriptions are given and the fraudulent charges by surgeons and drug companies,
-the "enforcer" of the rules, penalties, incentives and how he/she will be chosen for the job (a new czar or surgeon general???)
-the board of "experts" who will decide the amount of health to be covered by the government plan (when and how much subscriptions and surgery is necessary?)
-how to stop the abuse by patients who are illegals or getting medical attention for non-emergency issues,
-who controls the database of health histories, visits, subscriptions, and xrays,
-how will they regulate "supply and demand" with more patients and less doctors/nurses, will they have govt grants for surgeon & nursing schools??
 
Back
Top