Rec.food.cooking Reorganization
- Thread starter mbm052969
- Start date
shorrtiee :)
New member
On Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:50:02 -0600, Usenet Big 5 wrote:
Just looked at news.announce.newgroups and there is no post about a
proposed split.
Just looked at rec.food.recipes - again no post about a proposed split!
If you feel the need to do something to reduce the noise and inappropriate
posts, get Google to clean up their house and actually do something about
the usenet abuse and usenet spam that originatte from their googlegroups
servers.
All in all, a really nice troll and you get an A for effort, but an F for
followthrough.
--
Posting from groups.google.com or www.foodbanter.com or other web-forums
dramatically reduces the chance of your post being read.
Use the real usenet!
Eternal-september is free, .
Just looked at news.announce.newgroups and there is no post about a
proposed split.
Just looked at rec.food.recipes - again no post about a proposed split!
If you feel the need to do something to reduce the noise and inappropriate
posts, get Google to clean up their house and actually do something about
the usenet abuse and usenet spam that originatte from their googlegroups
servers.
All in all, a really nice troll and you get an A for effort, but an F for
followthrough.
--
Posting from groups.google.com or www.foodbanter.com or other web-forums
dramatically reduces the chance of your post being read.
Use the real usenet!
Eternal-september is free, .
empty_zombie_faced
New member
Stu wrote:
Steve didn't bring up the topic of changing rfr's status. I did.
And this is mostly musing on my part.
--
Jean B.
Steve didn't bring up the topic of changing rfr's status. I did.
And this is mostly musing on my part.
--
Jean B.
Usenet Big 5 wrote:
that
Who the hell are you, little Hitler?!!
You're just trolling for comments?
For your information rfc has been a noisy place for years not weeks.
To split it into unmoderated newsgroups is ludicrous. Everybody can post
to them all, solving nothing.
And since you don't have a valid email address. you're just talking out
of your ass.
Troll.
Andy
that
Who the hell are you, little Hitler?!!
You're just trolling for comments?
For your information rfc has been a noisy place for years not weeks.
To split it into unmoderated newsgroups is ludicrous. Everybody can post
to them all, solving nothing.
And since you don't have a valid email address. you're just talking out
of your ass.
Troll.
Andy
mfiaprncss
New member
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:23:10 -0700, "Janet Bostwick"
wrote:
I can always tell who is using Windows Live because it doesn't put in
attribution markers and there is no add on that will. Quote Fix has
apparently been abandoned by its developer. Go with Forte.
You mean the Brit trolls that were following certain Brit posters from
group to group?
Ditto
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
wrote:
I can always tell who is using Windows Live because it doesn't put in
attribution markers and there is no add on that will. Quote Fix has
apparently been abandoned by its developer. Go with Forte.
You mean the Brit trolls that were following certain Brit posters from
group to group?
Ditto
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 10:38:10 -0800, Dan Abel wrote:
My server has 25 rec.food.xxx groups, including rec.food-cooking with
15 posts - 4 of them were out and out spam and the newest post of any
type appeared last November.
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
My server has 25 rec.food.xxx groups, including rec.food-cooking with
15 posts - 4 of them were out and out spam and the newest post of any
type appeared last November.
--
Today's mighty oak is just yesterday's nut that held its ground.
xtremelybored
New member
In article ,
"Janet Bostwick" wrote:
Well, let me make a pitch now for you *not* using Microsoft Windows Live
Mail. As you can see above, it did not quote what nb posted correctly.
Your post and his appear to be at the same level. With Microsoft
Outlook Express, there was a fix to this. I don't know if there is for
Microsoft Windows Live Mail. I believe that Forte Agent quotes
correctly.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
"Janet Bostwick" wrote:
Well, let me make a pitch now for you *not* using Microsoft Windows Live
Mail. As you can see above, it did not quote what nb posted correctly.
Your post and his appear to be at the same level. With Microsoft
Outlook Express, there was a fix to this. I don't know if there is for
Microsoft Windows Live Mail. I believe that Forte Agent quotes
correctly.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
third_wise_man
New member
On Mar 7, 3:08?pm, rosie wrote:
Amen!
Amen!
"Dan Abel" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In article ,
"Janet Bostwick" wrote:
Well, let me make a pitch now for you *not* using Microsoft Windows Live
Mail. As you can see above, it did not quote what nb posted correctly.
Your post and his appear to be at the same level. With Microsoft
Outlook Express, there was a fix to this. I don't know if there is for
Microsoft Windows Live Mail. I believe that Forte Agent quotes
correctly.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
Thanks for the input. That's what I need.
Janet
news:[email protected]...
In article ,
"Janet Bostwick" wrote:
Well, let me make a pitch now for you *not* using Microsoft Windows Live
Mail. As you can see above, it did not quote what nb posted correctly.
Your post and his appear to be at the same level. With Microsoft
Outlook Express, there was a fix to this. I don't know if there is for
Microsoft Windows Live Mail. I believe that Forte Agent quotes
correctly.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
Thanks for the input. That's what I need.
Janet
JoshAntmann23
New member
In article ,
heyjoe wrote:
Is it a moderated group?
I *know* that one is moderated. And the moderator is not posting
*anything*.
Fix the deficits, too, will you?
And stop all the wars?
I don't know how these things work, but it's a request for discussion.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
heyjoe wrote:
Is it a moderated group?
I *know* that one is moderated. And the moderator is not posting
*anything*.
Fix the deficits, too, will you?
And stop all the wars?
I don't know how these things work, but it's a request for discussion.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
iijastronaut
New member
On Mar 7, 7:13?pm, sf wrote:
thank you sf.
thank you sf.
In article , "Jean B."
wrote:
I've been reading/posting here for almost 20 years, off and on. I've
looked in on rfr on occasion. As far as I am concerned, for needs that
I have seen, it has never been functional, especially once the world
wide web got up to speed. I can find vast quantities of lousy, untested
recipes on the web, and they are much easier to search for.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
wrote:
I've been reading/posting here for almost 20 years, off and on. I've
looked in on rfr on occasion. As far as I am concerned, for needs that
I have seen, it has never been functional, especially once the world
wide web got up to speed. I can find vast quantities of lousy, untested
recipes on the web, and they are much easier to search for.
--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 14:23:08 -0500, "Jean B." wrote:
But your headers have been removed through the posting thread, I was replying
to squirts, not you.
--
Stu
Recipe of the week "HYDERABADI CHICKEN BIRYANI"
http://foodforu.ca/recipeofweek.html
So much more than just a recipe website
But your headers have been removed through the posting thread, I was replying
to squirts, not you.
--
Stu
Recipe of the week "HYDERABADI CHICKEN BIRYANI"
http://foodforu.ca/recipeofweek.html
So much more than just a recipe website
Ckingster9
New member
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:06:10 -0600, Stu wrote:
Actually, STUP, you didn't indicate to whom you replied... and
whenever anyone posts here they are posting to the entire planet and
any ETs who happen to be in the hood, STUP! May I suggest, STUP, if
you need to whisper sweet nothings in the dwarf's ear that you take it
to email, STUP!
Actually, STUP, you didn't indicate to whom you replied... and
whenever anyone posts here they are posting to the entire planet and
any ETs who happen to be in the hood, STUP! May I suggest, STUP, if
you need to whisper sweet nothings in the dwarf's ear that you take it
to email, STUP!
Jackiquline P
New member
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 08:36:39 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
Actually my post was only to firm up what everyone already knows, that Sqwertz
doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. As for my post back to Jean, it
was only to comment on her headers being removed from the thread, and I thought
it was squirts that I was replying to is all.
Actually my post was only to firm up what everyone already knows, that Sqwertz
doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground. As for my post back to Jean, it
was only to comment on her headers being removed from the thread, and I thought
it was squirts that I was replying to is all.