re:climate change wouldn't starting all over with both sides doing the science be
the right thing to do? personally, i am a global warming skeptic and didn't need to go any further than al gore to know this is all bullshit of the highest order. but having said that, if all those involved in this issue REALLY wanted to get to the truth, and in light of the recent outing of the promoters of this nonsense at the u. of e. anglia, shouldn't we be re-doing the science from scratch and have a truly transparent evaluation of the evidence? it seems to me this is the only way any credibility on this subject can be regained...
the right thing to do? personally, i am a global warming skeptic and didn't need to go any further than al gore to know this is all bullshit of the highest order. but having said that, if all those involved in this issue REALLY wanted to get to the truth, and in light of the recent outing of the promoters of this nonsense at the u. of e. anglia, shouldn't we be re-doing the science from scratch and have a truly transparent evaluation of the evidence? it seems to me this is the only way any credibility on this subject can be regained...