Instead of the usual talk about the collectors of Hadith forging Hadiths, about the sect-centric Mullahs being paid to spread the Hadiths to people, the over-reliance of isnad over the matn, and so on.
Why don't you yourselves take the responsibility to actually take part in an endeavor to re-evaluate the authenticity of these Hadiths? Why don't you yourselves actually investigate and re-evaluate let's say, the Sahih Bukhari (which in fact has already been re-evaluated by so many scholars), and use the 'critical eye' and see which Hadiths actually are the true words uttered by the Messenger of Allah (pbuh)?
All I hear is talk, talk, talk. Well, do something about it if you actually doubt the authenticity of Hadiths, instead of poisoning the thoughts of people here.
There is a clear methodology if you are familiar with the Uloom Al-Rijal, which I am not, so I cannot comment much. Point 4 is invalid, because there is a consensus of the issue of the Sahabah, please don't mix it up with sectarian issues.
Do elaborate more on the isnad-matn concern of yours.
Why don't you yourselves take the responsibility to actually take part in an endeavor to re-evaluate the authenticity of these Hadiths? Why don't you yourselves actually investigate and re-evaluate let's say, the Sahih Bukhari (which in fact has already been re-evaluated by so many scholars), and use the 'critical eye' and see which Hadiths actually are the true words uttered by the Messenger of Allah (pbuh)?
All I hear is talk, talk, talk. Well, do something about it if you actually doubt the authenticity of Hadiths, instead of poisoning the thoughts of people here.
There is a clear methodology if you are familiar with the Uloom Al-Rijal, which I am not, so I cannot comment much. Point 4 is invalid, because there is a consensus of the issue of the Sahabah, please don't mix it up with sectarian issues.
Do elaborate more on the isnad-matn concern of yours.