"Prophet Mohammed Lovers"

Maybes it's 'cos I'm stoned, but I'm totally getting the correlation between Silent Bob and my Swamp Thing avatar.

If it was intentional, then JP, I salute you.

If not, then my imagination > the internets.
 
emperorIX said:
Rubbish, indeed.

Islam as a religion is simply a banner under which certain groups, who strive to gain politically or economically, have sought to rally support. The underlying message of Islam is clear and is likely a familiar one to most westerners, as it most likely owes its roots to Judaism and Christianity. the religion itself has never condoned the present acts of terrorism as the religion is only being used to rally support for the causes of other groups. Often passages are taken out of context to justify these acts much like the witch burnings have been justified by poorly translated passages from the bible in an attempt to further subjugate women and stamp out other competing beliefs. So, one can't really state that Muslims are to blame. The fact that these terrorists are Muslim is simply circumstance, these acts of terrorism at its roots are not motivated by religion, but by politics. They are simply pawns in a politically motivated struggle that has been going on for centuries.

The current acts of terrorism can be directly attributed to western meddling in middle eastern affairs, motivated by western interests in the region. But, this isn't anything new. The west has a long history of imposing its will on other nations in its efforts to secure its own interests in natural resources. So, it was bound to happen that a nation would rise up against them. And, for impoverished countries that are outgunned, terrorism is a natural choice as a method of warfare...it has proven highly effective so far. I mean look at the reaction of 9/11, most people weren't even aware of the terrorism taking place abroad. Some have called it cowardly, but how else does David stand up to Goliath?

Anyway, the point i was trying to get across...the Muslim religion is not to blame for terrorism, politics is the true culprit. there's nothing inherently wrong with the religion and it has its fair share of ignorant followers as do all religions...some of which are apperently in this thread.

And to the OP's comment about PML's sigs professing their faith, professing your hatred of something is far from the same as stating that you love something. I mean, why would anyone want to illicit the inevitably negative reactions to such a sig. And to suggest that they should be removed, what if I objected to TPB because it tracks child porn? would it be right for me to suggest that this site disallow any mention of it in sigs? Unlikely. To each their own, live and let live, and so on.

Sorry for the long post to those that bother to read it.
Click to expand...

I enjoyed reading that. True story.
 
S3v3N said:
well that's wrong they don't do that ...
i told you most English movies and topics now a days aim to give the wrong idea about Islam and i really can't blame them with all those extremist fascist Muslims that are giving the wrong idea about Islam to the whole world !

i know fascism are not the Muslim problem alone there are extremist in every religion !
Click to expand...

Why are all these terrorists and people causing war, all Muslim though? Surely that tells you something, why do you see no Buddha's, or Sikhs, Rastas, all starting terror like this, surely that tells you something.
 
Imagine_If said:
On the surface it might indeed seem so, but you would be surprised what search terms pr0n sekkers use when searching for..erm pr0n like these

0 chock on cum
0 christy canyon
0 cj job
0 climaxxx
0 clit
0 clits
0 closeup
0 cocksucker
0 colpi di penello
0 coming to an end
0 commie
0 cum all aver
0 cum all over
0 cum swap
0 cumdrink
0 cumjuice
0 cummer
0 cummers
0 cumshot
0 cumshot1
0 cumshots
0 cumspit
0 cumswap

This is a small part of our block list that has in total 560 terms...and it is swelling, by the day. :)
Click to expand...

Some I can see merit in but other than appauling speeling why would anyone search for commie in the hope of something coming up?
 
Mr JP Fugley said:
So they vary on one very specific thing and are exactly the same on everything else. In what they believe and in how they worship.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Would they inter-marry and the like or do the people tend to "stick to their own"
Click to expand...

To be fair the respect for the order circumstances permitted did involve a little bit of blood letting and the Sunni majority tend to see the Shias as bit "iffy".
 
moslem01 said:
totally what ???
shame on u , did u read koran ?? read sorra el tawba ( 5 ) and (29)
and tell me what deos it say ?
Click to expand...

popcorn.gif
 
yes.we all have to question our faith
i was born muslim but after that i choose islam cause i believed it's the right way.
some radicals though don't agree to that.they are twisting some verses to stop people from thinking.
but Allah asks us to read and to think and observe and choose.


Mr JP Fugley said:
You see how people may misconstrue what your religion teaches mate. If blokes say / post stuff about killing non-believers.
Click to expand...
i don't get what you mean?
may you explain.sorry
 
is this stuff for real ?:unsure:



1. The first verse (1:1),known as "Basmalah," consists of 19 letters.
2. The Quran consists of 114 suras, which is ..............19 x 6.
3. The total number of verses in the Quran is 6346, or ....19 x 334. [6234 numbered verses & 112 un-numbered verses (Basmalahs) 6234+112 = 6346] Note that 6+3+4+6 =.......19.
4. The Basmalah occurs 114 times, despite its conspicuous absence from Sura 9 (it occurs twice in Sura 27) & 114= 19x6.
5. From the missing Basmalah of Sura 9 to the extra Basmalah of Sura 27, there are precisely ...............19 suras.
6. It follows that the total of the sura numbers from 9 to 27 (9+10+11+12+...+26+27) is 342, or .............19 x 18.
7. This total (342) also equals the number of words between the two Basmalahs of Sura 27, and 342 = ........19 x 18.
8. The famous first revelation (96:1-5) consists of .......19 words.
9. This 19-worded first revelation consists of 76 letters .19 x 4.
10. Sura 96, first in the chronological sequence, consists of .....................................................19 verses.
11. This first chronological sura is placed atop the last ..19 suras.
12. Sura 96 consists of 304 Arabic letters, and 304 equals .19 x 16.
13. The last revelation (Sura 110) consists of ............19 words.
14. The first verse of the last revelation (110:1) consists of ................19 letters.
15. 14 different Arabic letters, form 14 different sets of "Quranic Initials" (such as A.L.M. of 2:1), and prefix 29 suras. These numbers add up to 14+14+29 = 57 = ......19 x 3.
16. The total of the 29 sura numbers where the Quranic Initials occur is 2+3+7+...+50+68 = 822, and 822+14 (14 sets of initials) equals 836, or ................. 19 x 44.
17. Between the first initialed sura (Sura 2) and the last initialed sura (Sura 68) there are 38 un-initialed suras 19 x 2.
18. Between the first and last initialed sura there are ....19 sets of alternating "initialed" and "un-initialed" suras.
19. The Quran mentions 30 different numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 19, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 99, 100, 200, 300, 1000, 2000, 3000, 5000, 50,000, & 100,000. The sum of these numbers is 162146, which equals 19x8534.
Click to expand...

reminds me of LOST :dabs:
 
On the surface it might indeed seem so, but you would be surprised what search terms pr0n sekkers use when searching for..erm pr0n like these

0 chock on cum
0 christy canyon
0 cj job
0 climaxxx
0 clit
0 clits
0 closeup
0 cocksucker
0 colpi di penello
0 coming to an end
0 commie
0 cum all aver
0 cum all over
0 cum swap
0 cumdrink
0 cumjuice
0 cummer
0 cummers
0 cumshot
0 cumshot1
0 cumshots
0 cumspit
0 cumswap

This is a small part of our block list that has in total 560 terms...and it is swelling, by the day. :)
 
S3v3N said:
and we are just less than tiny micro species living in a tiny land compared to the vast universe .
Click to expand...

why would your god be bothered if people believed in him or not then?

Also, surely in all of his infinite skillz he must have decided to create another species on one of the countless other planets out there, if so, are they all muslim and will you be meeting them in heaven? Or would they have a different heaven?

Or is he more of a one planet at a time type of chap?
 
Actually Mohamed said to slay those who were rejecting faith and were not rejecting because they had any confusion with regards to it, rather they were rejecting out of mere arrogance and pride,
He commanded Muslims to slay down those 'infidels' from amongst the polytheists.
The Jews and Christians, on the other hand, because they belonged to monotheistic faith, were to be fought against until they became politically subservient to Muslims.
 
To be fair the respect for the order circumstances permitted did involve a little bit of blood letting and the Sunni majority tend to see the Shias as bit "iffy".
Click to expand...
Suna and Shea live every where in the middle east hand be hand and they never fought each other.
the only blood shed between suna' and shea' was in Iraq .
through centuries tehy didn't fight until lately when us army started making conspiracys between the suna and shea' and that was there plan i remember reading this somewhere.
all the Muslim big religion men " moftees " say that the fight between suna' and shea' was wrong and must stop ! but the damage already happened and blood was shed , and blood draws blood . hope they can sort things out in Iraq.
 
Back
Top