Privacy

Well can any one else come up with wording for a privacy amendment that protect ones rights to unwarranted entries into ones home. Protects ones rights to have sex whenever, where ever and with whom ever you chose. Protects a womans right to have an abortion and protects peoples right to die.


I guess some people don't believe in privacy and the government sould be allowed to controll every aspect of your body and behavior.

There should be one guiding principle in scociety.

Everything you do is ok if you do no harm to others. Everthing should be allowed unless it Physically hurts some one or thier property. All moral laws need to be abolished unless they deal with the previous two principles, theft, murder, and assult.
 
Now while I think people should have a right to their own privacy (a.k.a. sometings I don't really want to know about in the first place myself anyway) I have a filling that, no matter how it's worded, I could almost guarentee that in a century (or an area of time in a respective distance of a century) there will be people coming on to a forum like this and saying something about how it sounRAB good but should we really take it as it is writen, oh but wait, the wording is weird so it doesn't make sence.(ect...) There are still people arguing about the exact rights given in the original bill of rights. (Especially with how the first and second are writen.) My point here is that no matter how it is writen, there will be people who don't understand it.
 
If only you guys had a clue about that which you are speaking.

Colombia is the country not Columbia. Cocaine is illegal in Colombia. Unrefined coca as leaf is traded internally as it is in most Andean countries.

Steeeeeeeeve - Please tell me about your time spent in the NetherlanRAB.
 
This should be the case without this Constitutional amendment. If we passed this it would be ignored just as much as the other parts of the Constitution.
 
First of all, let me apologize for the spelling of the country.
Second, I promise there have been people who have told me (with a much larger group in a teacher/faculty ran event) that there is some kind of drug that is illegal here in the US that they use like sugar and mix in with their coffee and other food and drink items. Isn't coca chocolate? That's not an illegal drug here in the US. Now, if I missed interpreted coca, let me know, please.
 
They do currently. I would propose an ammendment changing that. Basically something saying that on private property, 2 conseting adults can do anything they want as long as it doesn't hurt anyone else or infringe on their rights.

fine.



it goes both ways. I support the right of people to do whatever they want to as long as it doesn't hurt others, but I also don't think the government should bail out people who choose to do this kind of thing. If someone does drugs and neeRAB to go to the hospital and can't afford it, that's their problem. They chose to do drugs, they knew the possible consequences, now they get to face them. That's what life is.
 
Well in this case....no to all 3

Section 1 is bad because I don't believe people should be allowed to make bombs in their home, grow weed in their homes, or do herion-meth-x in their home (in privacy).

Section 2 because prostitution should be left to the states just like gay marriage and gay sex.

Section 3 because abortion is wrong and if anything should be left to the states.


All the issues that may deal with privacy that should be in the constitution are already there. Once again a blanket right to privacy is no good for a civil society.
 
The right for people to do whatever they want until it hurts someone else is a very bad way to look at things. This is because people look at it from a "face value" view. Someone shooting up herion in their house isn't really hurting you right now is it? What about 20million people doing this? Does it hurt you now? Well not directly but when they don't show up to work because they have OD or when the ambulance has to take them to the hospital or when people can't afford it and thus have to resort to violence to get it then it might start hurting others. France is a good example of how not looking at the big picture can cause real long term probelms.
 
But for the weed and other drugs, the cops need a warrant to get in and look for that stuff. It doesn't mean they can't go in ever, just not without a warrant.

As to sex, I don't like his "wherever" phrasing as that can lead to people in a tree next to a church getting it on. Anyway, I see nothing wrong with gay sex or prostitution being legal. Legal prostitution protects the girls a lot. Their pimps can't beat them.

I agree abortion is wrong, but I think sometimes moral relativity comes in. If the options are:
- woman and child die (mother left to die and child dies with her because her body ceases to care for child)
- child dies (abortion)
Take the child's death as it saves at least the mother's life.
 
Isn't this a tad bit niave? If prostitution were made legal what makes you think a pimp wouldn't beat up one of the girl's if he felt so inclined? Oh, yes, the law says he can't.

Hmmmmmmm, tell that to all the battered spouses and significant others that are abused daily. I am sure they had no idea the law was on their side. I hope they all go tell their abusive partners and then run like hell or better yet just wait for the long arm of the law to come enfold them in their protective wings. Yep, that ought to do it. More laws that is exactly what we need, don't you all agree. :xbanghead
 
Back
Top