The Changeling
New member
1994 was that year for me. The final straw was Clinton and the democrats passing the gun ban.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
President Obama to Talk to Press at 1pm
- Thread starter RBnumber20
- Start date
100% Scorpio
New member
this guy is out right garbage
Dude...this is the democratic party motto. Say one thing do the opposite and deny all responsibility.
I'm not saying the Repubs are innocent, but the last 2.5 years and the HUGE increase in spending is all the Dems.
But what we will hear today is "we need to invest more to get more jobs going, spend more on social programs...it's Bush's fault. "Now let me be Clear...."
I'm not saying the Repubs are innocent, but the last 2.5 years and the HUGE increase in spending is all the Dems.
But what we will hear today is "we need to invest more to get more jobs going, spend more on social programs...it's Bush's fault. "Now let me be Clear...."
he's 100% right in how mentality works
the more you "give" or handout, the more that population easily sides with people that keep it going. as the entitled crowd grows, they vote in candidates that keep it going
that's why a person running a campaign on the promise of reshaping entitlements to a "work for money" gig wouldn't have a fucking prayer
the more you "give" or handout, the more that population easily sides with people that keep it going. as the entitled crowd grows, they vote in candidates that keep it going
that's why a person running a campaign on the promise of reshaping entitlements to a "work for money" gig wouldn't have a fucking prayer
B
Bob Sanchezel
Guest
S&P also implied we are fucked if Obama is reelected
Kumquat May
New member
we are so fucked
kingfresh512
New member
for the first time ever, entitlements paid out were more than revenue taking in
does ANYONE see a problem with this?
does ANYONE see a problem with this?
also, its really not that big of a deal
Power. Everyone loves power. I'm guessing that the rich like it more than most people, on average. Another bad idea is to give the rich two votes apiece in any election. That's double the power of other citizens. But don't worry that it will distort election results. There aren't that many rich people, and they are somewhat divided in their opinions, just like the rest of the world. And realistically, is the candidate who gets 51% of the vote always better than the one who gets only 49%? That's a risk I'll take.
Power. Everyone loves power. I'm guessing that the rich like it more than most people, on average. Another bad idea is to give the rich two votes apiece in any election. That's double the power of other citizens. But don't worry that it will distort election results. There aren't that many rich people, and they are somewhat divided in their opinions, just like the rest of the world. And realistically, is the candidate who gets 51% of the vote always better than the one who gets only 49%? That's a risk I'll take.