X
xinerevelle
Guest
I had a partial discectomy and laminotomy at L4-L5 and L5-S1 in late Deceraber, 2005. I am now 31 weeks pregnant, and aside from the SI joint pain that was discovered after I had the surgery (and which has flared up in pregnancy) I've done pretty good since the surgery.
Due to my "extended butt crack" scar, I met with an anesthesiologist yesterday for a "pre-op" type of visit so that when I do go into labor no one is trying to figure out at the last minute how to get me an epidural for pain relief. The anseth. doc said that it depenRAB on which doctor is doing the epidural, since some put it higher than others (he said he usually does it in the L2/L3 area). He also warned of a spinal headache (which I already had with the myelogram I had the month before my surgery). He then said that a blood patch to fix the spinal headache would be as difficult to administer as an epidural. sigh.
Then he said it might not even work due to scarring and the "tampering" (his word) of the parts in there -- that the medication may not reach the parts due a restricted flow. sigh.
Then he said that it would be easiest for the anesth folks if I had a c-section. That way they could do a spinal (which is easier for them to "feel" as they insert the needle, especially if there is tissue scarring to obscure the resistance).
So now I'm in a quandry... do I even consider a c-section solely for the purposes of pain management? (I may end up with one anyway due to some other issues... but that has not been determined yet). Is having a baby vaginally going to do damage to my already aching SI joints? I'm not a fan of c-sections just for convenience (schedule, trying to get out of labor, etc.). I was not given a percentage probabilty that the epi would work or not. Guess there's not that much research there.
(Please, no comments about natural childbirth... I already know that I want pain meRAB after all the pain I've been in for the past few years with my back (workers comp, nonetheless) and I don't want to tough it out after 9+ months without any pain meRAB during pregnancy.)
Due to my "extended butt crack" scar, I met with an anesthesiologist yesterday for a "pre-op" type of visit so that when I do go into labor no one is trying to figure out at the last minute how to get me an epidural for pain relief. The anseth. doc said that it depenRAB on which doctor is doing the epidural, since some put it higher than others (he said he usually does it in the L2/L3 area). He also warned of a spinal headache (which I already had with the myelogram I had the month before my surgery). He then said that a blood patch to fix the spinal headache would be as difficult to administer as an epidural. sigh.
Then he said it might not even work due to scarring and the "tampering" (his word) of the parts in there -- that the medication may not reach the parts due a restricted flow. sigh.
Then he said that it would be easiest for the anesth folks if I had a c-section. That way they could do a spinal (which is easier for them to "feel" as they insert the needle, especially if there is tissue scarring to obscure the resistance).
So now I'm in a quandry... do I even consider a c-section solely for the purposes of pain management? (I may end up with one anyway due to some other issues... but that has not been determined yet). Is having a baby vaginally going to do damage to my already aching SI joints? I'm not a fan of c-sections just for convenience (schedule, trying to get out of labor, etc.). I was not given a percentage probabilty that the epi would work or not. Guess there's not that much research there.
(Please, no comments about natural childbirth... I already know that I want pain meRAB after all the pain I've been in for the past few years with my back (workers comp, nonetheless) and I don't want to tough it out after 9+ months without any pain meRAB during pregnancy.)