R racecar Guest Dec 6, 2009 #1 very stright forward. let's keep it simple. Yes or no, let's just see how the vote turns out.
C Chewy Ivan 2 New member Dec 6, 2009 #4 Yes. Prohibition caused more problems than it solved. The same is true for the ban on marijuana.
J Jeff T New member Dec 6, 2009 #5 Maybe. There has to be some way to determine if someone was driving under the influence. Solve that, and my maybe becomes a yes.
Maybe. There has to be some way to determine if someone was driving under the influence. Solve that, and my maybe becomes a yes.
C Chewy Ivan 2 New member Dec 6, 2009 #7 Yes. Prohibition caused more problems than it solved. The same is true for the ban on marijuana.
D dubious New member Dec 6, 2009 #8 No. We already have enough dopes on our roads with the drunks. Now imagine trying to harness all the pot heads in, as well.
No. We already have enough dopes on our roads with the drunks. Now imagine trying to harness all the pot heads in, as well.
C carolynjane4 New member Dec 6, 2009 #9 Yes. (Sorry, I have to give a brief explanation. If someone else uses marijuana, how does it affect you? If it doesn't affect you, why would you care whether or not it is legal?)
Yes. (Sorry, I have to give a brief explanation. If someone else uses marijuana, how does it affect you? If it doesn't affect you, why would you care whether or not it is legal?)