renewable energy companies? . . . is this a possible conflict of interests>
The infamous magazine, Private Eye (issue 1257, p.27), reports that John Saunders, the head of a new government appointed body set up take planning consent issues away from local councils has shares in many of the companies whose proposals he will supposedly be reviewing.
The Infrastructure Planning Commission will take its direction from the Department for Energy and Climate Change (seriously, that's its name) and will have a budget of £400 BILLION! - that's about six hundred billion dollars - over the next decade.
As the Eye reports:
The infamous magazine, Private Eye (issue 1257, p.27), reports that John Saunders, the head of a new government appointed body set up take planning consent issues away from local councils has shares in many of the companies whose proposals he will supposedly be reviewing.
The Infrastructure Planning Commission will take its direction from the Department for Energy and Climate Change (seriously, that's its name) and will have a budget of £400 BILLION! - that's about six hundred billion dollars - over the next decade.
As the Eye reports:
-------------------------------------------------
""Those likely to be affected by the turbines to come will at least hope Saunder's commission makes its decisions impartially and transparently. So it is not reassuring that it recently refused to release details of its commissioner's financial interests, telling the Eye that it was 'personal information protected by the data protection act'.
This was always nonsense, and the Eye has now forced a detailed response from the commission using freedom of information laws. The details perhaps make the reason for the initial secrecy clearer. Saunders has declared shareholdings in the following companies: National Grid, National Power, Powergen, Innogy and Northern Ireland Electric"
-----------------------------------------
As these companies have detailed proposals (such as Innogy's application for two massive wind farms) up for review, is it right that the guy appointed by the Dept. for Energy and Climate Change has shareholdings in the very same companies? Could this be known as "Pulling a Gore"?
And why is it that you can only get information on anything to do with climate change by suing in court using freedom of information laws? Isn't the idea to spread the truth?
.