Phones swamped, servers crash as voters slam Congress

What is he saying now? He is certainly singing a different tune.

The Obama of 2008 is totally different than the Obama of 2011. He has essentially done the opposite of what he said he would do as President.[/QUOTE]
because 2006 is a lot like 2011

since 2006 was one of those years where in a full on recession.


lol my bad, we weren't
 

FACTS/OPINIONS:


1. OUR FOUNDING FATHERS HATED A GOV'T THAT COULD ACT QUICKLY. As a result, they decided to make a system that was very effective at being ineffective, albeit, balanced via checks/balances/powers/etc.

2. IN THE PAST TWO DECADES OUR TAX CODE HAS GOTTEN ENTIRELY TOO COMPLICATED/FUCKED UP. Shit desperately neeRAB to be fixed and simplified. It's a true mess.

3. POLITICIANS ONLY CARE ABOUT RE-ELECTIONS. I wouldn't have much hope for progress.
 
So the rich with all the money in the bank will be making ever more with the high interest rates while the average person who neeRAB a loan will be fucked.
 
My sources show that:

1) the public supports COMPROMISE
2) the public blames the Republicans for failure to compromise.

Try again, monsier Derp.
 
What is he saying now? He is certainly singing a different tune.

The Obama of 2008 is totally different than the Obama of 2011. He has essentially done the opposite of what he said he would do as President.[/QUOTE]

i know what he said.

it is called having to
#1 compromise and hit moving targets
#2 transform from ideology to rational action.
 
because 2006 is a lot like 2011

since 2006 was one of those years where in a full on recession.

lol my bad, we weren't[/QUOTE]



What are you trying to say exactly?

We are still in a recession. We are borrowing and printing our way into economic doom - regardless of where our current debt limit is. We can't sustain our current spending. Obamacare would tear down the entire economy once it is in effect.

The real unemployment figure is right around 15.8% right now. That is people who are currently receiving benefits and people who stopped receiving benefits and are still actively seeking employment. If you add in people who are UNDEREMPLOYED and working part-time while looking for a better full-time job the real figure is right around 21%.

If the government would lower taxes and create a better business environment where companies would hire our unemployment rate would fall. When more people are back to work there is a larger base to collect taxes from and we wouldn't need to borrow (as much).

EDIT: You fucked up your quoting KGB.
 
Back
Top