OT: RFC used to Demo Software

On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:09:31 -0400, "jmcquown"
wrote:


Obviously *he* does and if he had the self discipline to stop
morphing, he would have been listed as the top poster.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On 26 Apr 2011 14:29:30 GMT, notbob wrote:

You're making me think I should try that sometime. I think I used
canned salmon the first time I made croquettes, but I didn't like
shaping them into those christmas tree shapes and then frying. It was
good enough, but not worth the effort. I've never tried creamed
salmon. Never even considered creaming canned salmon, but the idea is
appealing to me. Maybe I'm hungry.


--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On 4/26/2011 11:38 AM, Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:

I have no memory of canned salmon as a kid, and I was born in 1962 and
raised Catholic. We had things like grilled cheese, pancakes or mac and
cheese on Friday's during Lent. I think we had tuna casserole, too.
 
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:22:52 -0400, Cheryl
wrote:


The problem is that it doesn't work with Win7 Live whatever it's
called.

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:37:41 -0800, Mark Thorson wrote:


Are you really THAT stupid, Mark?

make your posts count for something. Don't just post to babble.

-sw

-sw
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:14:12 -0400, jmcquown wrote:


I was wrong when I said Outlook Express. Apparently that is written
for Outlook only, which is still in production and widely used by
corporations. Outlook can be customized much easier than outlook
express VIA those types plugins. I forget the name of the package
that makes that possible (Visual Studio Tools for Office?).

-sw
 
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:29:47 -0500, Nunya Bidnits wrote:


So what puts the RE: line above?

It's not normal for OE quotefix to do that. And you're the only
poster I've seen that has started generating that line (started about
2 months ago). It's ugly and unnecessary.

-sw
 
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:50:38 +0200, ChattyCathy wrote:


They and their respective psychologists and sex reassignment doctors
all togoether and married them together with some new experimental
techniques and rug therapies. Blake said the results were not too bad
looking. Go figure.

-sw
 
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 05:59:12 -0400, "Ed Pawlowski"
wrote:


You won't find me using that stuff, even if it's the 2010 version -
but a lot of people here do and there was no sudden change from 2010
to 2011 IMO.

Why can't your news reader see my sig line delineator?

--
I love cooking with wine.
Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
On Mon, 2 May 2011 14:28:35 -0500, Nunya Bidnits wrote:


It's a duplication of part of a line already in the headers. And you
know it will just come back to bite you during your next troll.

Just say'n ...

-sw
 
In article ,
Sqwertz wrote:


So is the other line in the attribution. So is the subject. So are any
partial headers that a newsreader displays. And I've seen the message
id in the attribution lines before. Some attribution lines just have
the "from" info. Some have the date. A few have the message id.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
 
On Mon, 02 May 2011 16:46:03 -0700, Dan Abel wrote:


But they don't take an extra two lines of "valuable" screen real
estate to do it(*). Who else uses 4 lines for attributions? I have
20 lines to display the body of messages. Marty's uses 1/5th of them.

-sw

(*) That was for mouseless-notbob
 
On 5/2/2011 10:16 PM, Sqwertz wrote:



My reader, Thunderbird, lets you show headers, or not. The thing I don't
get is while it quotes with the proper number of characters for each
poster when I quote a thread in full, why did it put >> > (extra greater
than sign) when I just select part of the post to quote? Who knows.
 
In article ,
Cheryl wrote:


But it only lets you see headers for the post you are currently reading.
Putting the message id in the attribution lets you see it later
downstream.

--
Dan Abel
Petaluma, California USA
[email protected]
 
Back
Top