One, two, Freddy's coming back for you....

Taylor

New member
Rumours are abound recently that if the new remake of the original Nightmare On Elm Street movie is a commercial success that New Line Cinema (now owned by someone else I believe) could well be tempted to bring back the Elm Street franchise that has effectively been dead for nearly twenty years, save from the 'New Nightmare' flick and 'Freddy Vs Jason', both of which could be seen more have spin-off's rather than part of the original series of movies in the late 80s and early 90's.

The "franchisation" of successful horror movies is a long established tradition. Indeed at times you wonder if there are many films in that genre that don't have many different Roman numerals after it's title. Saw VI, Poltergiest III, Alien IV....etc.

Of course it'd be interesting should this new movie spark interest in the Freddy films (his last big screen appearance made a profit of around $85m) is what road they'll go down.

Remakes or new material?

I think there is still some mileage on the Elm Street series and that the fact it was derailed and bastardised after the first two (some argue the first) shouldn't really dismiss the possibility of returning the character to it's roots and stripping away the jokes, puns and other comic book type side show that it has been associated with for at least the final Elm Street movies.

This could of course all be nonsense but even without the rumours and speculation, you'd think chances are if 'Freddy' does prove to be a hit once more, it'd be quite hard to resist the temptation to resurrect him on a more permanent basis.
 
I don't doubt this new film will be a success and I for one am looking forward to seeing it. If it hits the mark I think they should continue the franchise with new material.

My generation (and possibly the next) will always know Wes Craven was responsible for bringing Freddy Kreuger into our lives, it will be interesting to see if the new versions (if any) will be as iconic in years to come or will they forever be compared to the "old days".
 
I don't find the look of the new Freddy as scary as the original. He just looks like a bad burns victim, but Robert Englund seemed to bring more than just that to it, plus I would argue the makeup for the original one was better in a way!
 
I just read that the budget for this is only $27 million so it'll definitely make a profit and there'll be sequels. That's the key with horror films. Make them cheap and the money will be rolling in like the Saw films so even if it only makes $50 million worldwide it'll still be deemed a success.
 
I think one thing that has soiled the franchise for many was the was-cracking character that Freddy turned out to be.

But if they can return him to this dark, twisted, scariness of the first film I think the franchise could work.

I think I'd have decided to make a new movie rather than remake the original. Still using Robert Englund however as I think he basically IS Freddy Krueger in many way.

I also think I'd have had Freddy chasing children rather than 'adults' or 'late teens' as he has in all other movies and will do in this one.

Whereas in the first movie and this one, the story is of young teens (people in their 20's) trying to convince their parents of this dream demon, it's actually parents desperate to keep their CHILDREN (child actors of around 10-14) safe.

It would also make it more creepy if he was chasing and seeking to molest young kiRAB also, as he invariably would.
 
Not a fan of Freddy or Michael. I prefer Jason. And even then he too is well passed it.

These serial killer franchises are old news!. They are best left in the past and remembered for the past glories.
 
Back
Top