ODI's are just as predictable as Test's, do you agree?

[tumtum]

Over the 50 overs, you can see clearly which team has control and the other team trying to pull off a miracle.

Usually in a series, you can see one team domitaing over the other in this format for all the games.

Also #1 Test teams are usually #1 ODI teams.

 

[Afnan]

yes u r right both formats are predictable.

 

[krishnamoorthynagarajan]

It is true that it has become predictable. However, most of the time, the stronger team tend to take it easy so much so, they wind up at the receiving end.

 

[Daler Mehndi]

You watched this recent Ashes series didn't you? How can you say it was predictable? At least in ODI's and Tests the teams can fight their way back into a match. in T20's you can lose the game in the first 2 overs.

 

[Evan]

Not always; a test match can be predicted on most occasions, but an ODI changes its nature every 3 or 4 overs. Take the current series between Eng/Aus. What can you predict on the basis of yesterday
's match? Initially I thought Aus was going to win hands down. Now, i don't know who are the favourites. The same with NZ/SL match. Everybody predicted a cake walk for SL. but the Kiwis turned the tables on them.
Ok, if a team is good in tests they 'll be in ODI too, so I'll buy your argument.

 

[Evan]

Not always; a test match can be predicted on most occasions, but an ODI changes its nature every 3 or 4 overs. Take the current series between Eng/Aus. What can you predict on the basis of yesterday
's match? Initially I thought Aus was going to win hands down. Now, i don't know who are the favourites. The same with NZ/SL match. Everybody predicted a cake walk for SL. but the Kiwis turned the tables on them.
Ok, if a team is good in tests they 'll be in ODI too, so I'll buy your argument.

 

[Saare Jahan se Achha ~~~]

I do not think so. Tests are most unpredictable.
ODI's are more predictable.

 

[OBAMA ReBORN]

Nothing Always

 

[OBAMA ReBORN]

Nothing Always