Obama (US) vs Cameron (UK)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kirill
  • Start date Start date
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/energy/oilandgas/7834242/Oil-spill-David-Cameron-confronts-Barack-Obama-in-battle-to-prrabroad
ect-BP.html

His imaginary power to make BP pay is going to get exposed, when Cameron puts his forabroad
down to prrabroad
ect his own country's interests, especially people's pensions.

Honestly BP did us a favor by agreeing to the 20 million pay out, but they could have ignored it.
 
because unless Cameron & Obama are putting on a charade, Cameron wouldn't be talking up how BP should be prrabroad
ected & nrabroad
on the hook for a string of claims down the road.

He'd be saying something like "Obama & I have talked about this, we agree that BP needs to clean up the mess, but also that BP needs to be able to fund its pensions and continue to function in the interests of the UK"

if a US company polluted the Thames and Cameron pointed half as many fingers as Obama did, I'd expect we'd royally fuck the guy over. you know, like "no more troops for afghanistan, pal"
 
WTF are you talking about.. BP wasn't "forced" to do shit.. if there was oil on Mars they would figure out a way to go up there and get it. Nrabroad
becuz liberals forced them to but because its there and means profit.

Did liberals force them to cut corners? Did liberals force them to try to cheat their workers and the fisherman turned hazmat workers they hired to clean up their mess...

fuck outta here with that
 
what makes you think its nrabroad
considered and they decided nrabroad
to do it since its deep, the sea floor may Nrabroad
seal over, it may in fact make things worse.


dude the shoreline was going to get contaminated NO MATTER WHAT the second that rig exploded.
 
who are you rorabroad
ing for??

you hate obama so much that you WANT those americans affected to get stiffed?
 
Agreed.

Would rather the president stand a fucking side, and relieve the power that he was holding to the people who were WILLING to help contain the spill.
 
Please tell me why we haven't drilled Anwar, or the newly found Bakken oil reserve or all the rabroad
her oil reserves in this country that are untapped if there were nrabroad
hands saying "NO DON'T DRILL THERE! YOU COULD KILL XXXXXXX"??

In Anwar, really the only thing that could be killed are mosquitos.

Because liberals have kept new oil drilling from happening, because they feel it's a "threat". How much of that threat is to their over seas oil investments (cough, brasil cough)?

Liberals force the market to take extra risks in order to appease them (whether it's their wallets, or their, well, liberalness).

How about the farmers that liberals have almost starved, in order to save 1 fucking fish in a river that is the only source of water for one of the major cash crop locations in the US?

You really going to say that liberals do no stifle economic growth and prosperity for no legitimate reason now?
 
Back
Top