God, you're hopeless. It's not pure silver because there's light reflecting on it. Again, even if there is red, it's not as obvious on the K800i pictures, and in the cases that you pointed out, it's the reflection of LIGHT. The LIGHT is not pure WHITE, and hence why there is a shade of red/yellow/etc.
Um... I bought the rose, I took the picture of the rose and I can probably vouch for the fact (at least better than you) that the rose is actually that colour. As for it being grainy.... errr ok.
Yes, there is a bit of redness in the pic I suppose, but again it's not as obvious as the blue mist/haze in the N73 which completely destroys the pics in low light. I also am not fond of the overprocessing (as many others have repeatedly pointed out to you). As I have stated again and again, i'm not doubting the fact that there is a reddish tint, but I'm saying that 1) It's not as prevalent/obvious as the N73 and 2) it doesn't destroy the picture beyond repair combined with the N73's overprocessing especially in dim light. Also, the redness could again be caused by the light that was shining on it on the kitchen table, and hence the yellow/red haze at the side reflecting on the table mat. I really don't remember the environmental conditions surroudning that pic since it was a while ago.
Um... it's grainy because there's noise because there's dim light (it was a hazy day), just like any other digital camera. You don't see it in the N73 (or at least not as much) because of excessive processing and noise reduction. Noise can be reduced through programs such as noiseware, loss of detail due to overprocessing can't be recreated. Same goes for #4.
I don't think you understand the point, and this has been beaten to death over and over again in multitude N73 threads and discussions across the net. There is less noise inherent in the N73 pics because of overprocessing and saturation of colours, resulting in loss of detail. This is evident as seen through that picture of the city with the bulidings in the distance that you posted.
No, you dont' have to. But it would definitely give you more credibility since you would actually know how the picture was taken and under what environmental conditions. It's interesting how you claim that others are fanboys when they can actually give better opinions and insights because they actually owned either or both phones whereas you're arguing without personal experience. If anything, it seems that you're displaying more fanboyism, as already pointed out. Also, are you suggesting that I'm making up the fact that I owned an N73? That's a low blow
It's also amazing how you repeatedly either don't read people's posts or either don't get what people are trying to get at. The point of the VGA pictures is to show you that there is no crazy blue/red/whatever colour haze in low light/night pictures unlike the N73's blue haze which completely destroys the pics.
There's no point in arguing with you when you haven't owned either phone, repeatedly miss people's points by either not reading what they say or just decide to go off on a tangent of your own, or don't see things that a million of others on the internet have discussed to death. Again, if you owned either phone, you can probably form a better first hand opinion.
As an aside: Do a simple search for "N73 blue haze" and "N73 over processing" on Google and you'll find that many people are talking about the same thing. On the other hand, a search for "K800i red mist" or "K800i red haze" comes up with very little if anything. I guess the entire interweb is ignorant
And since you love GSMarena so much:
[/b]
http://www.gsmarena.com/kg920_k800_n73_photo-review-125.php
Also, gsmarena states throughout the entire review that the K800i gives better colour reproduction compared to the N73 with more detail. Also, they only commented on the red tint that you constantly talk about in the K800i photos in ONE of their photo samples, whereas the oversaturation and loss of detail is evident throughout all of the N73 pictures. Obviously, you've thrown the red tint out of proportion.
Um... I bought the rose, I took the picture of the rose and I can probably vouch for the fact (at least better than you) that the rose is actually that colour. As for it being grainy.... errr ok.
Yes, there is a bit of redness in the pic I suppose, but again it's not as obvious as the blue mist/haze in the N73 which completely destroys the pics in low light. I also am not fond of the overprocessing (as many others have repeatedly pointed out to you). As I have stated again and again, i'm not doubting the fact that there is a reddish tint, but I'm saying that 1) It's not as prevalent/obvious as the N73 and 2) it doesn't destroy the picture beyond repair combined with the N73's overprocessing especially in dim light. Also, the redness could again be caused by the light that was shining on it on the kitchen table, and hence the yellow/red haze at the side reflecting on the table mat. I really don't remember the environmental conditions surroudning that pic since it was a while ago.
Um... it's grainy because there's noise because there's dim light (it was a hazy day), just like any other digital camera. You don't see it in the N73 (or at least not as much) because of excessive processing and noise reduction. Noise can be reduced through programs such as noiseware, loss of detail due to overprocessing can't be recreated. Same goes for #4.
I don't think you understand the point, and this has been beaten to death over and over again in multitude N73 threads and discussions across the net. There is less noise inherent in the N73 pics because of overprocessing and saturation of colours, resulting in loss of detail. This is evident as seen through that picture of the city with the bulidings in the distance that you posted.
No, you dont' have to. But it would definitely give you more credibility since you would actually know how the picture was taken and under what environmental conditions. It's interesting how you claim that others are fanboys when they can actually give better opinions and insights because they actually owned either or both phones whereas you're arguing without personal experience. If anything, it seems that you're displaying more fanboyism, as already pointed out. Also, are you suggesting that I'm making up the fact that I owned an N73? That's a low blow
It's also amazing how you repeatedly either don't read people's posts or either don't get what people are trying to get at. The point of the VGA pictures is to show you that there is no crazy blue/red/whatever colour haze in low light/night pictures unlike the N73's blue haze which completely destroys the pics.
There's no point in arguing with you when you haven't owned either phone, repeatedly miss people's points by either not reading what they say or just decide to go off on a tangent of your own, or don't see things that a million of others on the internet have discussed to death. Again, if you owned either phone, you can probably form a better first hand opinion.
As an aside: Do a simple search for "N73 blue haze" and "N73 over processing" on Google and you'll find that many people are talking about the same thing. On the other hand, a search for "K800i red mist" or "K800i red haze" comes up with very little if anything. I guess the entire interweb is ignorant
And since you love GSMarena so much:
[/b]
http://www.gsmarena.com/kg920_k800_n73_photo-review-125.php
Also, gsmarena states throughout the entire review that the K800i gives better colour reproduction compared to the N73 with more detail. Also, they only commented on the red tint that you constantly talk about in the K800i photos in ONE of their photo samples, whereas the oversaturation and loss of detail is evident throughout all of the N73 pictures. Obviously, you've thrown the red tint out of proportion.