K
kill_yr_television
Guest
Wouldn't "No terror attack since 9-12" be a lot more accurate?
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
K
Kool Aid
Guest
No terror attack since 9-11 is the right phrasing. It's like saying, "I haven't tripped since yesterday." That implies that I tripped yesterday, but haven't tripped since.
L
lukep135
Guest
well ya your right i guess. but 9-11 rings more of a bell than 9-12
maybe if someone said 9-12 they'd mistake it for the time
maybe if someone said 9-12 they'd mistake it for the time
E
End Fed NOW!!!
Guest
There have been no Alien attacks either, does that mean the government is doing a good job of protecting us against Aliens?
D
drummer_40
Guest
Considering many of our friends have been attacked since then, it's an incorrect assertion by myopic partisans. Attacking our friends is the same thing to the terrorists who lump our allies in with us as "The Great Satan"
-Spain: 11 March 2004
-England: 7July 2005
-India: 26-29 November 2008
-Spain: 11 March 2004
-England: 7July 2005
-India: 26-29 November 2008
M
Mercer Devil
Guest
No. Neither are accurate. Al Qaeda has pulled of several terrorist attacks since 9/11. Even the US has not been terror free. I would say the DC sniper incident was a terror attack.