King of the Hill has been a suprisingly satisfying show for being a long running animated series. News of the series' cancellation this year was kind of a bummer for me and the series' fans until Fox announced that there would be two to six new shows airing next year (or going straight to DVD) to wrap the whole franchise up. Now since it IS just a cartoon we can't expect TOO much in the way of closure. I'd like to see some resolution for Good Hank and the whole Bobby/ Connie 'ship though I won't hold my breath. But I think the biggest story the show has been tip-toeing around since it's inception has been Nancy Gribble's affair with John Redcorn. They have devoted countless episodes since their break-up around the idea that Dale STILL has no idea and that no-one has the heart to break it to him.
I kind of see the series' point on this. Dale LOVES his boy Joseph and the truth could needlessly tear him and his son apart. Depending on Dale's reaction this could obliterate friendships in the neighborhood (since everybody BUT Dale knew) and cause a great deal of conflict. Do we really want to see that in the series' final episodes ever?
But...
Nancy can't just get away with it. She is consistantly the most reprehensible character on the show (although she is given a MEAN run for her money by Peggy Hill) and Dale, for all of his MANY faults has been nothing but a devoted and faithful husband to her. What kind of message does that send to the audience that people can REALLY hurt the people they supposedly love and not have to take responsibility for it? Or is that the entire point of it?
Frankly, part of me wishes that Nancy and John Redcorn had never broken up. It was just a joke when the series started and I wish they hadn't tried to assign a moral judgement to it. But the series having Nancy go back to Dale and reject Redcorn firmly puts the long-running gag in the "cautionary tale" camp. I would feel REALLY cheated if the series ended and Nancy was never given her comeuppence.
What say you?
I kind of see the series' point on this. Dale LOVES his boy Joseph and the truth could needlessly tear him and his son apart. Depending on Dale's reaction this could obliterate friendships in the neighborhood (since everybody BUT Dale knew) and cause a great deal of conflict. Do we really want to see that in the series' final episodes ever?
But...
Nancy can't just get away with it. She is consistantly the most reprehensible character on the show (although she is given a MEAN run for her money by Peggy Hill) and Dale, for all of his MANY faults has been nothing but a devoted and faithful husband to her. What kind of message does that send to the audience that people can REALLY hurt the people they supposedly love and not have to take responsibility for it? Or is that the entire point of it?
Frankly, part of me wishes that Nancy and John Redcorn had never broken up. It was just a joke when the series started and I wish they hadn't tried to assign a moral judgement to it. But the series having Nancy go back to Dale and reject Redcorn firmly puts the long-running gag in the "cautionary tale" camp. I would feel REALLY cheated if the series ended and Nancy was never given her comeuppence.
What say you?