Hi Janice,
It is just a personal preference, I guess. The important thing is that the doctor be FELLOWSHIP-TRAINED in issues of the spine. This is a one or two year addition training after a doctor's residency. In this regard, neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons have very similar training. They are both very well qualified to treat and operate on any issue of the spine. Obviously, the neuro-surgeon's training specializes a bit more on nerves, and the ortho on bones...but since this is so entwined in the spine, both groups are learning about both.
I did a lot of research over 3 years before I had my surgery. I consulted with 8 different specialists, 2 neurosurgeons, 1 physiatrist and the rest were orthos. The neurosurgeons were going to do much more surgery, i.e. a 3-5 level fusion while all the orthos said a 1 level. I just found the neurosurgeons to be far less interested in treated the more mundain back prblems, such as mine. The orthos were much more down-to-earth and easy to deal with. But as I said this is just my personal experience. But I have seen it reflected by others on the board.
I was just suggesting that you don't need to think that you can only see a neurosurgeon. You just wouldn't want to go to an ortho who did everything -- knees, hip replacements, etc. You need one who only works on issues of the spine.