National Health Care

Original question!!

National Health Care

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I believe that the majority of supporters for universal healthcare wouldn't be in favor of it if the costs were borne by them. What do you think?
Check all that apply


The bill they are currently passing
Section 2716
 
The problem is, we have reached the tipping point in America where there are more parasites, socialists, revolutionary power-grabbers, and welfare dependents than there are decent, hard-working, traditional Americans to support them.
 
The leeches and looters of America don't care about anything except where their next free meal is coming from, my friend, and the NWO despots are having a field day with the producers and their property - taking as much as possible and destroying the capitalist system in preparation for a full communist tyranny.
 
If National Healthcare is such a good thing to have, why did the Democrats have to bribe members of their own party to get it passed?:confused:
 
You believe wrong. Almost everyone in favor of universal health care thinks that everyone should kick into its funding whatever they can contribute.
 
I stand by my original assertion. Some broke-a$$ fool saying that he'd pay for healthcare if he just had two nickels to do so doesn't mean squat! :xcensored
 
Really it didn't. The concessions made by those few holdouts was mainly just to benefit their own state...such as local hospitals, companies, etc.

AHIP actually opposed the bill which makes you believe health insurance companies don't want the bill...and they probably don't but that doesn't mean they don't get anything out of it. They still make bank, just have to do a lot to get there.
 
Ummm, you did notice that I said "I" would be willing to pay higher taxes for this didn't you? I've paid into the tax system all my life with no deductions. I've never received any government benefit because I'm lucky, I've never been unemployed and would only consider a job if it had health benefits. So I'm not seeing the socialism here 'my friend.' Did you get your education in Florida by any chance?
 
For those that are Christians the ethics for this would be the rich person should pay for the broke person but the broke person has no right or entitlement to receive the care from the rich person. So if the rich person doesn't pay the broke person has no right to be upset.
 
It forces individuals to buy insurance from private companies. That's like forcing you to buy a car. How can that not help the insurance companies?
 
Back
Top