He is in jail awaiting trial for jumping bail, and a speeding ticket. He heard from a judge today that he has to appear Friday with an attorney and me. I don't know why I have to go because he is of age. Maybe because he lives with me? Judge said he cannot have a court-appointed attorney, but we can't afford anything else. Will the judge be swayed one way or the other in his decision when we show up Friday with no lawyer? It wouldn't seem fair, but I'm very worried.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
My son can't afford a lawyer for his misdemeanor charges?
- Thread starter lulu
- Start date
Joecracker
New member
Jumping Bail on a speeding ticket seems minsquell, Dont hire an attorney for that let him do his jail time and get it over with
pSyCho jOe
New member
Yes, the judge will be swayed to judge against your son if he doesn't have an attorney representing him because it looks bad on the judge when he has to convict a member of the poor class because they're criminal as a result of their poverty, but the judge won't come straight out and admit it because that would prove his judgment is biased.
I think you were invited because without an attorney, a judge can get an idea of why a defendant is the way he is based on his parents appearance and behavior in a courtroom environment. People with weight imbalance represent a chemical and therefor biological, or psychological imbalance. After accusing someone of being a criminal, the justice system would aim to send an individual ultimately to a mental institution for failing to assimilate a brainwashed, fear-driven society.
Study the books in your local LAW LIBRARY and ask questions at the Reference Desk. Your public library is likely to have the books you need checked out if you live in a highly populated area; however, it wouldn't hurt to search your public library database online before going, but there is also a chance you could come across a book that may help you that you couldn't browse through online without checking it out (assuming your library permits online item reservations).
Distinguish the sides of your argument that are personal feelings, emotion and exclude that aspect of your argument for the remaining provable facts. One trick a judge used to find me guilty when I was innocent, represented myself in court and despite 2/3 testimonies in my favor; I told him that he had to find me "Not Guilty" because there was reasonable doubt to believe that I was at fault; his reply was "they teach us that (trick) in law school". His education didn't preclude my innocence, but I think I was found guilty because if he were to have judged in my favor - he would have (in theory) earned the votes (that you get when you're running for a public servant servant such as a judge) of only myself; however, in judging against me he earned the approval and (political) support of my opponents represented in the courtroom that were there litigating against me. It's impossible to prove judicial bias without hiring private investigators to trail your judge, your accusing officers, your witnesses and the plaintiffs most likely, without interfering unlawfully.
Live life walking on eggshells; people are itching to throw their fellow human beings in jail so they can have this world all to themselves.
I think you were invited because without an attorney, a judge can get an idea of why a defendant is the way he is based on his parents appearance and behavior in a courtroom environment. People with weight imbalance represent a chemical and therefor biological, or psychological imbalance. After accusing someone of being a criminal, the justice system would aim to send an individual ultimately to a mental institution for failing to assimilate a brainwashed, fear-driven society.
Study the books in your local LAW LIBRARY and ask questions at the Reference Desk. Your public library is likely to have the books you need checked out if you live in a highly populated area; however, it wouldn't hurt to search your public library database online before going, but there is also a chance you could come across a book that may help you that you couldn't browse through online without checking it out (assuming your library permits online item reservations).
Distinguish the sides of your argument that are personal feelings, emotion and exclude that aspect of your argument for the remaining provable facts. One trick a judge used to find me guilty when I was innocent, represented myself in court and despite 2/3 testimonies in my favor; I told him that he had to find me "Not Guilty" because there was reasonable doubt to believe that I was at fault; his reply was "they teach us that (trick) in law school". His education didn't preclude my innocence, but I think I was found guilty because if he were to have judged in my favor - he would have (in theory) earned the votes (that you get when you're running for a public servant servant such as a judge) of only myself; however, in judging against me he earned the approval and (political) support of my opponents represented in the courtroom that were there litigating against me. It's impossible to prove judicial bias without hiring private investigators to trail your judge, your accusing officers, your witnesses and the plaintiffs most likely, without interfering unlawfully.
Live life walking on eggshells; people are itching to throw their fellow human beings in jail so they can have this world all to themselves.
thatartistwin
New member
OK, can I safely assume that your son is the one telling you he cannot have a court appointed attorney? If so, you can imagine that the son you raised to act out in this way is also lieing to you. If one cannot afford an attorney they are appointed one BY LAW. In addition, there is no reason in the world you should have to be in court and if you were not given documents demanding you appear in court that is also probably a lie on your sons part.
Funny that you mention fair. What is really not fair is that us tax payers have to pay for your derelict sons lawyer.
Funny that you mention fair. What is really not fair is that us tax payers have to pay for your derelict sons lawyer.