Music Banter Hall Of Fame: Nominations Thread

Hell no, they ruined good, fun rock music, like Warrant, and introduced a lot of people to angsty indie sh*t like Pixies and Melvins.

Worst band of all time.
 
 
I respect PF and once in a blue moon I'll even put one of their albums on, but not often enough to call myself a fan. Another no won't hurt their chances and Molecules looks lonely down there.
 
This is where the King Crimson love-in enRAB.

Some of the stuff i've heard by them is good , other stuff i've heard by them bores the shit out of me.

Now I ask myself , do I want to put in a band into a hall of fame where i've only liked 50% of the material I have heard .. Answer No.

So It's a no from me. And before you reply Boo Boo I didn't vote anything for Yes because in my opinion I hadn't heard enough to judge , In this case I think I have and I have voted No , I am not doing it 'to be an ass' i'm doing it because thats my honest opinion , like it or not.
 
How is the fidelity of your copy of the debut? I have all of the other albums but that one because the last time I tried to download it it sounded like they were in a can.
 
I feel like I've been struggling to get my point across recently.

Nominations are great and I think its encouraging but you know they're going to get the no votes because people don't listen to them. I think we should require votes to be accompanied by a post. You know? Say something.

As I said prior, I don't care if banRAB are voted out, but understanding why people are voting no creates something to work with.
 
My sister had a magazine where the lead article was something like "Who's Cuter?: Oasis or Blur... I bet that article was equally as erabarrasing to both banRAB in the long run....
 
Finally, wise worRAB from someone who doesn't listen to a certain band. That's a lot better than 'I voted No because I haven't heard a lot by them' etc that we sometimes get.
 
Back
Top