T
tuffcowboy87
Guest
Good evening everyone. I am the new guy on here. I have been browsing the boarRAB for a while and also doing research on my own. I am a 23 year old male who has been having issues with my back, hips and radiating pain for a long time. The hip and back pain since high school, but the radiating pain and severe outer thigh pain for about two years or so. I am on tramadol, neurontin, skelaxin, vicodin, ibuprofen. I recently recieved the results from my MRI and I really am nervous about the findings and impressions, and here is how the MRI report reaRAB:
IMPRESSION:
Minimal left paracentral disc bulge/protrusion at L5-S1. No significant central canal or foraminal compromise noted in the lurabar spine.
PROCEDURE:
Inversion-recovery, T1-, and T2-weighted images of the lurabar spine were obtained in multiple imaging planes without intravenous contrast. No comparison study.
FINDINGS:
Conus medullaris has normal signal intensity and terminated at T12.
L1-2 through L3-4: No evidence of significant central canal or foraminal narrowing.
L4-L5: Minimal disc bulging. Bilateral facet hypertrophy. No significant central canal or foraminal narrowing.
L5-S1: Invertebral disc dessication. Mild disc bulge with minimal component of shallow left paracentral protrusion. There is no significant displacent of the S1 nerves. There is no significant central canal narrowing. There is facet hypertrophy bilaterally. There is no significant canal compromise.
I am just unsure exactly what the MRI is saying. I have been trying to do reasearch. And I know I will have to ask my doctor, but the MRI states "significant" many times. Does significant mean there is a problem? I see my doctor tomorrow, just wondering if anyone else has any answers. Thank you for your time and God bless.
IMPRESSION:
Minimal left paracentral disc bulge/protrusion at L5-S1. No significant central canal or foraminal compromise noted in the lurabar spine.
PROCEDURE:
Inversion-recovery, T1-, and T2-weighted images of the lurabar spine were obtained in multiple imaging planes without intravenous contrast. No comparison study.
FINDINGS:
Conus medullaris has normal signal intensity and terminated at T12.
L1-2 through L3-4: No evidence of significant central canal or foraminal narrowing.
L4-L5: Minimal disc bulging. Bilateral facet hypertrophy. No significant central canal or foraminal narrowing.
L5-S1: Invertebral disc dessication. Mild disc bulge with minimal component of shallow left paracentral protrusion. There is no significant displacent of the S1 nerves. There is no significant central canal narrowing. There is facet hypertrophy bilaterally. There is no significant canal compromise.
I am just unsure exactly what the MRI is saying. I have been trying to do reasearch. And I know I will have to ask my doctor, but the MRI states "significant" many times. Does significant mean there is a problem? I see my doctor tomorrow, just wondering if anyone else has any answers. Thank you for your time and God bless.