Mitt Romney Failed To Present Clear Vision for the Future - U.S. News & World Report

D

Diablo

New member

About Zerlina Maxwell:
Zerlina Maxwell is a Democratic strategist and contributing writer for The New York Daily News, EBONY.com, theGrio.com, and Feministing.com.

Conventions are carefully coordinated political infomercials intended to make the top of the ticket look presidential and ready for primetime. The 2012 Republican National Convention not only made Mitt Romney look like an afterthought, it exposed a big liability in his entire campaign for president: Romney has no distinct vision for the future of the country.
Attacking the current administration is not enough. Romney had the task of introducing himself to the country, attempting to appear empathetic with the struggles of ordinary Americans, and most importantly, showcasing his plans for where he would take the country if elected.
[See a Slideshow of the 11 Most Memorable Political Convention Speeches.]
On night one, Ann Romney introduced Romney's softer side in a speech that did help him appear more human than any past appearances or interviews. Arguably though her speech did not succeed in making Romney appear empathetic, as portions of the speech felt forced in a "we understand your pain" kind of way, when it was ultimately clear that the Romney's do not. When your definition of "struggle" is cashing in stock options to pay for your children's education, you don't understand what most Americans are going through.
The most important goal for Romney should have been showcasing his plans for the future of the country. Romney failed first because he selected speakers who were all about their own political futures. Speaker after speaker only mentioned Romney's name sparingly, apparently more concerned with their personal audition for 2016, than helping make the case for Romney in 2012.
Last night, Romney himself was upstaged by actor Clint Eastwood who introduced him and went overtime in a bizarre performance that left many scratching their heads. While the conventions always give the candidates a small bounce in the polls, it's clear that Romney let this critical moment slip away.

Tags:Ann Romney,Republican Party,Republican National Convention,2012 presidential election,Mitt RomneyOther Arguments#1
[h=3]No — The RNC's happy talk allowed speakers to skip over the ticket's less cheery policy plans[/h]BRAD BANNON, President of Bannon Communications Research

#1
[h=3]No — The party faithful are already behind Mitt Romney, but he failed to make the case to voters[/h]PENNY LEE, Democratic Strategist and President of Venn Strategies, LLC

#4
[h=3]No — RNC's speakers focused on Romney's intangibles, not the platform[/h]BRANDON ROTTINGHAUS, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Houston

#5
[h=3]Yes — Tampa an overall success, but if the GOP was looking for a winning message, it didn't build it[/h]JAMIE CHANDLER, Political Scientist at Hunter College

#6
[h=3]Yes — The RNC overcame Isaac, united Republicans behind their nominee, and improved Romney's White House chances[/h]FORD O'CONNELL, Republican Strategist, Conservative Activist, and Political Analyst

#7
[h=3]Yes — The convention presented Mitt Romney as a compassionate leader capable of turning country around[/h]LARA BROWN, Author of 'Jockeying for the American Presidency: The Political Opportunism of Aspirants'

#8
[h=3]Yes — Mitt Romney did an amazing job of defining himself[/h]JUDSON PHILLIPS, Founder of Tea Party Nation



p-89EKCgBk8MZdE.gif
 
Back
Top