In just a couple of months, California will be bankrupt and you know they will turn to the Federal government for assistance. I know Obama has already said none will be coming, but I suspect his tune will change when the stuff hits the fan.
Do you think it is right, or Constitutional, for the Federal government to lend money to a State in order to keep that State in business? Is it legal for the Federal government to own a State? (And in essence, they would, for if they call in the debt, CA would be forced to liquidate assets).
Are we ready to watch a State disappear, and absorb all of thier liabilities among the other 49? Or do we prop them up again, and hope that history won't repeat itself again?
Do you think it is right, or Constitutional, for the Federal government to lend money to a State in order to keep that State in business? Is it legal for the Federal government to own a State? (And in essence, they would, for if they call in the debt, CA would be forced to liquidate assets).
Are we ready to watch a State disappear, and absorb all of thier liabilities among the other 49? Or do we prop them up again, and hope that history won't repeat itself again?