You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Metallica Vs. Megadeth debate.?
- Thread starter Dave Z
- Start date
magpieix A.L.M.N.
New member
Megadeth has higher highs, but more lows. Metallica's high may not be quite so high, but they have more of them. If that makes sense.
Æ
ƒαà ℓ
Guest
My vote goes to Megadeth.
I'm not a fan of Metallica.
I'm not a fan of Metallica.
cyberlarry7
New member
ANVIL! Lips!
F
Fed.66
Guest
Both bands are good, in just bout every aspect. Singing included (I love Mustaine's voice).
This debate is age-old. Everyone has got an opinion, too. I'm going to go with Megadeth. I like their songs more, and I think they have better albums over time (although in the late 80s I would've said Metallica had better albums... I think everyone will agree).
The thing is, Megadeth never became crap. Simple, and we've all heard it before: Metallica sold out and were never the same again.
This debate is age-old. Everyone has got an opinion, too. I'm going to go with Megadeth. I like their songs more, and I think they have better albums over time (although in the late 80s I would've said Metallica had better albums... I think everyone will agree).
The thing is, Megadeth never became crap. Simple, and we've all heard it before: Metallica sold out and were never the same again.
L
Leech's Phuket Campaign
Guest
Hammett for leads
Mustaine for vocals and riffs
Dave can lead, but Kirk can't sing or write riffs; so Dave
Mustaine for vocals and riffs
Dave can lead, but Kirk can't sing or write riffs; so Dave