Men In Black III

I heard the JP4 one too. Supposedly Spielberg wasnt happy with the way JP3 was done by Joe Johnston
so is back onboard for JP4 along with Michael Crichton who supposedly working on the novel which the film will be based on (like JP and JP2 were). Ive also heard rumours that the film will ignore everything that happened in JP3 so will once again focus on Jeff Goldblum's charachter Dr. Ian Malcolm.

Of course this is all rumour so dont be suprised if parts turn out to be wrong
 
...if anyone has seen M II B, then a 3rd part seem inevitable (if Tommy Lee Jones is still about then)
 
I "enjoyed" MiiB at the cinema and watched Austin Powers 3, both awful, both were sequels of great films. Austin Powers 3 mainly repeated the jokes from the first two, and even for someone who likes toilet humour, it was so crude that it was pointless, I only laughed once in the film. MiiB had a very boring storyline and it seemed bland and uninspired. Sequels actually tend to generate more money than the original, most likely because of the allure of the brand name. Austin Powers 3 for instance generated $40million, which is the biggest gross yet for an Austin Powers. Yet most will agree that it was the worst.
The problem is that when you go to the cinema to see a film, you pay you see itbefore you see it. You might have been warned that it would be bad, but you still go to see for yourself, because you don't get what they mean before yous ee it with your own eyes. It's a sad reflection of Hollywood that relies on sequels with no substance whatsoever to generate money, rather than original ideas, Truman Show people?
I mean come on we need original ideas to have sequels in the first place.
 
Back
Top