xoxdream_2003
New member
If you think about it...the Meg problem on Family Guy didn't really start till season six. Prior to that in seasons four and five she had a total of 6 episodes and a sub-plot revolve around her. True...there was Meg-bashing jokes but atleast she had episodes with something to do.
Well, anyway, the excuse for post-season five treatment of Meg has been that the writer's don't know what to do with her. Is that really the case or is it that Mila Kunis is just more busy now and can't attend many recordings? In 2008 she was the lead in two high profile movies, Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Max Payne. And she has other big roles coming up. So...maybe thats it? Besides, the writer's didn't seem to have a problem with her before. (And, yes, I know there has been different staffs of writers)
Look at these stats:
2 of the 7 season one episodes were Meg-centered. It's true that these episodes could be considered Peter episodes, but she played a big part nonetheless. Also, more amazing is that she actually got more attention than the other characters. Stewie, for example, only had sub-plots during this season. While Brian, Lois, and Chris only had one episode revolve around them.
4 of the 21 season two episodes revolved around Meg. In this season she takes a back seat to Stewie, Brian, and Lois but she got more attention than Chris. It should also be noted that two of the episodes were one the highlights of the season. You had the Real World-esque episode as well as the Lando Griffin episode.
In season three she only had one episode revolve around her, but had four sub-plots. But, anyway, in conclusion 11 of the first 50 episodes had Meg doing something. Which is better than now (7.5 out of 66) and pretty good considering that Peter, Stewie, and Brian are essentially the lead characters. And Lois is the main secondary character. So...considering that she's at the bottom of the barrell she did okay. Probably better than Chris.
Well, anyway, the excuse for post-season five treatment of Meg has been that the writer's don't know what to do with her. Is that really the case or is it that Mila Kunis is just more busy now and can't attend many recordings? In 2008 she was the lead in two high profile movies, Forgetting Sarah Marshall and Max Payne. And she has other big roles coming up. So...maybe thats it? Besides, the writer's didn't seem to have a problem with her before. (And, yes, I know there has been different staffs of writers)
Look at these stats:
2 of the 7 season one episodes were Meg-centered. It's true that these episodes could be considered Peter episodes, but she played a big part nonetheless. Also, more amazing is that she actually got more attention than the other characters. Stewie, for example, only had sub-plots during this season. While Brian, Lois, and Chris only had one episode revolve around them.
4 of the 21 season two episodes revolved around Meg. In this season she takes a back seat to Stewie, Brian, and Lois but she got more attention than Chris. It should also be noted that two of the episodes were one the highlights of the season. You had the Real World-esque episode as well as the Lando Griffin episode.
In season three she only had one episode revolve around her, but had four sub-plots. But, anyway, in conclusion 11 of the first 50 episodes had Meg doing something. Which is better than now (7.5 out of 66) and pretty good considering that Peter, Stewie, and Brian are essentially the lead characters. And Lois is the main secondary character. So...considering that she's at the bottom of the barrell she did okay. Probably better than Chris.