Hey again,
The reason your doctors aren't concerned is, you're right, 99 or 100 is not considered a fever. A lot of people say what you do, i.e. x degrees Fahrenheit is not a fever by defintion but it is a "fever for me". Well, I can see what you're saying, and I can imagine how you feel, but until you get over 38.3C or around 101 or 102F you can't call that a fever because, physiologically (and many studies have been done on this) normal physiologic processes can take your temperature to 100, but no normal physiologic process will ever take it over 100. One thing that is important is that women who are menstruating will have a normal rise in their body temperature when they are ovulating, and that might be what you're seeing in the variations in your body temp up to 100. Just remember that while there are certain differences among different people's bodies, temperature regulation (just like pH regulation of the blood) is VERY tightly controlled and the parameters of fever don't change for different people.
I'm sure, however, that the symptoms you are feeling are real, but if your body temperature associated with the symptoms is maximum 100F, you can't attribute them to a fever, because that's not what you have.
Many of the conditions I've mentioned will have CLUES in the bloodwork, but you have to specifically ask for those tests--they're not done on routine panels. Also, there is nothing you can do (short of a liver or bone marrow biopsy on yourself) which will delineate your symptoms further.
There is one question I have for you though: when you started having those symptoms you describe, you have mentioned yourself they don't always correlate with your body temperature. With the knowledge that normal body temperature fluctuates, and the fact that your "high normal" body temperature don't correlate with your symptoms, what is it that makes you think the two are related? (Please don't interpret this as an insult or anything. I just want to get an idea of how you're perceiving your situation).