Looking into the Bell's future through dishnetwork

  • Thread starter Thread starter cdnuser
  • Start date Start date
Since were looking into Bell's future via Dishnet, what are the long term effects of a change in ownership on existing relationships?

Would new owners look at the mess and decide to part ways with either DN or Nagra? Or both? What would DN do for an ECM testing ground with Canada being a nice sample size to play with?

Could that be why we aren't seeing the expected efforts to combat piracy since its really Charlie pulling the bigger strings and he has 'other' plans?

What if there were a merger of DN & DTV?
Would DTV be THE player and due to different technology, would Bell be left scrambling for another partner, or would that signal the demise of their DBS operations and signal the ramp up of the very delayed IPTV?


Given all the uncertainties, are they the right long term investment for your entertainment dollar?
 
Having been part of a development team that that wrote code for sat. HD DVR's, it's a trivial task.
In our case, we made it trilingual, English, French and Spanish as the unit was re-exported back to the U.S. for an OEM application.
A set a variables pointed to 2 or 3 language lookup tables.


Since you brought up the *C case, I wasn't going to...
Au contraire, In the *c case, THEY specify the hardware and business requirements and contribute BOTH to the middleware and IPG layers completely.
Au contraire again, I firmly believe *C is in an excellent position to go it alone if needed, but that hasn't happened yet.
Being owned by Shaw, their belief is to control their own destiny, hence they created their own Internet service and divested themselves of @Home. They developed their OWN VOD product and STB client s/w as they did the lions share of the latest *C receivers, not like they did with the old legacy units, so given their very heavy participation and ownership of the code and specs, it's a small matter to transfer basically manufacturing to just about any shop with the necessary tooling. Why would they drop $1M for the IPG source code to Gist?
Why did Moto come to Shaw/*c to write the IPG for the major OEM customer in 3 languages. BTW, I did all the graphics on that one as well.
Those working with a certain major automotive manufacture might recognize the similarities.
Could Bev do the same, I think not!

Sure, but what does that have to do with feature set. I ran a poll requesting what features the users wanted and was able to deliver on a great many of them, some never before done in ANY STB's, can you as a Bev subscriber say the same?
 
My bell refurb 5100 is JVC not echo. I have also seen RCA 311's out there when I was in the states a couple years back.
 
I don't know its official name, Open CI or the like, but the receivers have PCMCIA slots, and you get a PCMCIA card and likely also an ISO-7816 smartcard from the provider. It is used widely in Europe and likely Asia..
 
Bell's relationship with Dish Network is ideal. They produce good hardware, and work out most of the issues with the software and delivery system. All BEV has to do is copy what they do. Following the lead of a 13 million customer satellite company can't be a bad thing to do!

In sharp contrast, Starchoice picked a looser company to manufacturer their receivers and look what that got them! Motorola doesn't want any part of that business anymore, hence SC customers are stuck with a crummy PVR, that will likely never see a new feature.

I'm absolutely certain that BEV's relationship with Dish is a good one. I certainly hope they don't end it.

-Mike
 
COMMON INTERFACE - basically as you described, a CAM module (PCMCIA) + an ISO 7816 smart card.

http://www.answers.com/topic/common-interface


I've used them on commercial Bev installs in the backs of Tandberg receivers.
Also noticed them as options for some of the DVB-PCI cards I've played with.
Used for legit subscriptions to pay TV using your own hardware.

Although all the descriptions say

It's unclear if the TV's have some form of PSK tuner for sat. reception.
Since the CI seems to be part of the Conditional access and not related to the decoding of the R.F. signal.

Does this technology expand beyond DVB?
 
It IS ideal from the perspective of having little to no investment in the technology and being handed everything on a silver platter.

It would appears that Bells prime ability is to change a logo and phone number in the software.
Not very comforting if you ask me.

The downside is clearly that they loose control over their own destiny and are at the mercy of another company, for better as you suggest right now or worse, should that ever happen.

It limits them and their ability to create features of interest to the Canadian consumers, since they lack the engineering exposure.
It also lessens their voice with the bugs as Dish may chose to address their own issues first.
This arms length relationship may be the cause of many disconnects and denials when communicating with agents.

And as you pointed out, 13 Million subs, wow, so do you think Bev's paltry 1.8 M subs have any significant voice 'down there'?
 
Not really. It depends on a DVB receiver for a host. And non DVB formtats mostly have their own security scheme, such as DCII and DirecTV (which DirecTV is, I believe, somewhat close to DVB). There are no Open-CI DVB-S receivers on the market in USA/Canada, and I doubt in the rest of the world also.

I believe Cablecard is based on the same core concept, but I don't know if it is the same wolf in different clothes.
 
The 99 Jump, 2 modes actually.
1. you can press any number from 1 to 99 followed by the jump keys and navigate that many minutes forward or backward from you current position, a relative jump.
2. you can press info and enter the exact time in the program and jump there.
An absolute jump.

VERY useful on the commercials we all hate, instead of nailing the 30 sec forward jump multiple time, a 3 jump gets you right over a 3 minute comercial break.

This was a customer suggestion.

The choice of the blue colour display over the previous orange was a user choice. The addition of a dimable display and selectable 12/24 hour clock.
The 6 and 24 hour guide jumps using the FF/REW & Jump keys.

In the next code, a simplification of the DVR sort behavior.
The return of colour code genres in the IPG.
Full time video windows in all menus.

Since the team really wasn't bound be any existing products, it was an ideal relationship to design in the features people were asking for and to find better ways for some of the clunkier things done in other boxes.
Of course their is still a list of things to be done and when implemented, will be a better design than exists elsewhere.

Perhaps lots of small things, but collectively, they do make for a better user experience.
Of the 5 PVR's I have, I still prefer the *c units friendliness and it's only getting better.

Of the yet deployed features, I had created a roadmap that brought the BEST versions of a feature from virtually all set tops out there, so that nothing was missing, very deluxe.
 
Not unlike a provider carrying 1 channel the other doesn't.
Out of hundreds of stations, a person will choose one over the other, like you said, small things.

Or the difference being able to change your package immediately or not until the end of the month, small things.

Or getting a reasonable assortment of HD for free or $10, what's $10 to an HD fan, nothing, but some will choose based on that, again small things.

Or a 24/7 customer service dept. versus not, if you never call it doesn't matter, but again, small things.

Being treated as a respected customer versus being assumed you are a crook, small thing, maybe?

Because there is really no BIG THING well one actually, one is secure, they other isn't, so it all comes down to small things.
 
The jump is a useful feature that Bell is missing.

There isn't much point in making suggestions to Bell for software improvements. Make suggestions to Dish since they make all the changes before they get rolled out to Bell.
 
I find it easier to press the skip button a few times, than take my finger off it to type a number. Sheesh! Two years and that's all they've added. ARR, you brag about SC doing programming in-house. I'd say it isn't paying off. Show me a real feature.

-Mike
 
That's like calling up Charlie and telling him to knock it off with the ECM's so those Canadians stealing his signal can watch TV in peace.

I'll bet I can watch a 1 hour show faster than you can, na na! Gee whiz!
 
Back
Top