You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Logical and civil abortion debates?
- Thread starter Tori C
- Start date
BO the Magic Jeep
New member
47 million abortions and counting, a number that large would represent the 26th most populous country in the world.
That's what the courts are for.
Roe v. Wade was decided primarily on the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights. The Court's decision in this case was that the Ninth Amendment, in stating that "the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people," protected a person's right to privacy.
Roe v. Wade was decided primarily on the Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a part of the Bill of Rights. The Court's decision in this case was that the Ninth Amendment, in stating that "the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people," protected a person's right to privacy.
You expect conservatives to have a logical debate with people who cover their ears, stomp their feet, and scream "I'm not listening!" over and over?
SURE... let's have a rational talk. Let's agree there must be SOME middle ground.
Option 1 - Let's first agree that abortion is killing a human BABY. Not a "clump of cells"... not a "zygot".... a BABY.
Option 2 - Let's agree that rape and incest victims deserve a way to deal with an unnatural pregnancy, but maybe NOT everyone else.
Option 3- Let's agree that pregnancy was 100% PREVENTABLE in the first place, and anyone seeking an abortion is an irresponsible idiot, who is so irresponsible, they probably lack the ability to make an INFORMED decision about an abortion. (Hey, they were too dumb to PREVENT it, WHY trust them now with a decision that is LITERALLY life/death?)
Option 4 - Let's agree that after some point of development, it should NOT be allowed to be butchered and killed.
Option 5 - Woman want to make "grown up" decisions about killing their baby.... why not make it MANDATORY that they watch an abortion and see what is REALLY going on? IF after that, they still want one.... then fine. Let them kill their baby.
Option 6 - There should be some counciling on the REAL effect and regrets and depression and guilt that MOST women feel after killing their baby. THEN provide them some adoption options so they can make an INFORMED opinion.
OK.... on which of these issues can we find some middle ground?
The Conservative is here... where are my Lib friends and what concessions are they willing to make?
SURE... let's have a rational talk. Let's agree there must be SOME middle ground.
Option 1 - Let's first agree that abortion is killing a human BABY. Not a "clump of cells"... not a "zygot".... a BABY.
Option 2 - Let's agree that rape and incest victims deserve a way to deal with an unnatural pregnancy, but maybe NOT everyone else.
Option 3- Let's agree that pregnancy was 100% PREVENTABLE in the first place, and anyone seeking an abortion is an irresponsible idiot, who is so irresponsible, they probably lack the ability to make an INFORMED decision about an abortion. (Hey, they were too dumb to PREVENT it, WHY trust them now with a decision that is LITERALLY life/death?)
Option 4 - Let's agree that after some point of development, it should NOT be allowed to be butchered and killed.
Option 5 - Woman want to make "grown up" decisions about killing their baby.... why not make it MANDATORY that they watch an abortion and see what is REALLY going on? IF after that, they still want one.... then fine. Let them kill their baby.
Option 6 - There should be some counciling on the REAL effect and regrets and depression and guilt that MOST women feel after killing their baby. THEN provide them some adoption options so they can make an INFORMED opinion.
OK.... on which of these issues can we find some middle ground?
The Conservative is here... where are my Lib friends and what concessions are they willing to make?
I agree, they don't usually happen. Seems both sides have their minds made up already, and no one is ready to compromise.
I think it is possible, but it is rare and won't happen in the so-called "main stream media" who show great partisanship to the pro-choice side and rarely have I witnessed the opposite viewpoint from them.
I think it is possible, but it is rare and won't happen in the so-called "main stream media" who show great partisanship to the pro-choice side and rarely have I witnessed the opposite viewpoint from them.