mopar mike
New member
I've seen you liberals over and over question the education and intelligence of this woman while giving little or no regard to the successful results she has produced in her home state of Alaska. Obama on the other hand comes from a state of complete corruption that's in shambles. He himself having a very vague mysterious history that no one seems to know much about, nor do they seem to care, and yet he get's praises on all sides , and for what I ask you ? For running up more debt on a federal level than any single one president in history ? For having a Harvard degree ? For speaking well ? For being groomed well ?
Liberals, I'm sure Obama for all these things you admire him for would pass with flying colors for looking presidential in a Hollywood movie, but this is not a Hollywood movie . What good is a man possessing all these shallow externals I've listed above if he has produced no successful results ? What success has Obama demonstrated prior to or during his presidency that could possibly build your confidence in this man while at the same time meriting your clearly seen hatred for Sarah Palin ? Alaska is by far better off than Obama's state of Illinois ever was, both fiscally and in every other way . Also In advance for those who like point to Alaska's obviously vast oil revenues for their fiscal success, I want to say, so what ?
Liberals have demonstrated in every single state they've run, that an abundance of revenue from any source has never kept them from bankrupting a state. I point to California with the countries largest GNP as a prime example. A quick economics lesson for you, It's not what you bring in that matters , it's what you spend that makes the difference. Sarah Palin could have easily spent Alaska's surpluses on absolute garbage , such as political power grabs and wacko environmental projects like Obama has on a federal level, but she didn't. She saved that money for rainy days such as were having now, liberals would do well in learning a lesson from that.
Thanks in advance for your answers. God bless.
Liberals, I'm sure Obama for all these things you admire him for would pass with flying colors for looking presidential in a Hollywood movie, but this is not a Hollywood movie . What good is a man possessing all these shallow externals I've listed above if he has produced no successful results ? What success has Obama demonstrated prior to or during his presidency that could possibly build your confidence in this man while at the same time meriting your clearly seen hatred for Sarah Palin ? Alaska is by far better off than Obama's state of Illinois ever was, both fiscally and in every other way . Also In advance for those who like point to Alaska's obviously vast oil revenues for their fiscal success, I want to say, so what ?
Liberals have demonstrated in every single state they've run, that an abundance of revenue from any source has never kept them from bankrupting a state. I point to California with the countries largest GNP as a prime example. A quick economics lesson for you, It's not what you bring in that matters , it's what you spend that makes the difference. Sarah Palin could have easily spent Alaska's surpluses on absolute garbage , such as political power grabs and wacko environmental projects like Obama has on a federal level, but she didn't. She saved that money for rainy days such as were having now, liberals would do well in learning a lesson from that.
Thanks in advance for your answers. God bless.