liberal strategy to arguing?

A

anti-obama = pro america

New member
first if there is something they disagree with, yell out one of the following:
a) its racist
b) thats hateful
c)its a lie
d)blame jesus

2nd, when desperate or losing an argument:
a) attack a persons image
b) come one with a nickname (rush limpalls...)
c) blame jesus

when arguing about news events they dont like:
a) blame fox who is gaining viewers by the day
b) blame glenn beck or rush and call them crazy
c) blame fox some more
d) call more names
e)blame jesus

when faced with facts:
a) cry
b)start yelling
c) tell you you are ignorant or your facts are wrong.

am i missing anything?
gracias for proving my point libs :)
 
1. E) Call you a traitor to America
2. D) Call you a socialist
3. F) Say the media has a liberal bias
4. D) Say that your facts were compiled by a liberal





Oh sorry! That's the conservative strategy of arguing! Sorry about that.
 
That is why liberals never debate an issue, a debate requires thoughtful points to support an idea, libs cannot do this. Your post is totally accurate.
 
Conservative strategy to arguing:

1. Get on your high horse about all sorts of things liberals aren't actually planning to do
2. Call people names, e.g., B. O. for Obama
3. Rant about liberals
4. Make all sorts of accusations that aren't true, e.g., B. O. Obama wasn't born here or his insurance plan will have "death squads"
5. Incorrectly and erroneously use words that they don't understand, e.g., calling things "socialist" that had they looked in the dictionary they would realize aren't even remotely socialist
 
when faced with facts:
a) cry
b)start yelling
c) tell you you are ignorant or your facts are wrong

This is flawed. Conservatives never have facts. They make shit up as they go.
 
Nope. The typical tactic ignores a basic premise of effective argumentation--taught in college composition classes across the country--which acknowledges, but respectfully and logically disagrees with, the opposition.
Edit:
Ha--the libs are proving your theory as we speak! They can't even see the blatant poor sportsmanship!
 
yawn.........

As opposed to the con strategy for arguing which consists of spewing silly little fairy tales with no basis in reality then blocking those who smack you in the face with facts.
source: Your rant

Next time try tossing an occasional fact or two in with your infantile spewage.

LOL! I see I struck a nerve! Cons HATE facts and logic! ROFL!
 
The only way any of this is different from the Conservative strategy that Conservatives don't blame Fox News. Rather, they worship Fox as if it represented the second coming of Christ. I've posted proof that Fox lies, and I only get thumbs down.

I've posted innumerable studies, graphs, charts and proofs that Democrats are better at creating jobs, elimintating deficit, reducing debt and lowering unemployment rates. I only get thumbs down.

I've posted videos proving that Beck, Rush, Hannity - ALL of them - lie via omission and cropping. All I get is thumbs down.

Why? Because Conservatives don't like truth. So, we may use those tactics, and they are often true and accurate. Others, they are being thrown about irresponsibly. However, we STILL have facts on our side.

Conservative arguments are all talking points based on fear, anger, greed and paranoia.
 
Back
Top