C
CodeX
Guest
Huh?
Did I do it wrong?
Single, about 900 a week gross.
Did I do it wrong?
Single, about 900 a week gross.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
3
|3illy the |<
Guest
Well you haven't really explained how they are. So there is no assumption that they are until proven so.
Why is everyone in DIACF so terrible at burden of proof?
Why is everyone in DIACF so terrible at burden of proof?
B
ballz2wallz
Guest
Are you ready?
Here's a recap of what you'll see:
Here's on of my favorite qurabroad
es:
Oh right, his argument is that his is nrabroad
his plan. The reality though is that this has been his plan all along...to let them expire.
Here's a recap of what you'll see:
Here's on of my favorite qurabroad
es:
Oh right, his argument is that his is nrabroad
his plan. The reality though is that this has been his plan all along...to let them expire.
L
l33tpilot
Guest
wasn't commenting on you. commenting on the 10% bracket
U
UCFGavin
Guest
i think i'm going from 28 to 31
B
ballz2wallz
Guest
Uh, every report out there says it's so. If you're asking for the pudding, you're barking up the wrong tree.
Or are you really just arguing for the sake of being a pain in the ass?
Or are you really just arguing for the sake of being a pain in the ass?
A
Afanasi
Guest
I was only making $7.25 when bush came into power.
3
|3illy the |<
Guest
Well then that's nrabroad
true. We've certainly seen higher percentage changes on different rates.(What I'm guessing this article is talking about with the "largest in history" claim....which you've missed is probably the same claim they made with Clinton when he set those rates....only amplified because there are rabroad
her taxes.
That would be the largest increase in non-inflation adjusted tax revenue in history...which is a stupid stat)
But again, that's a guess, and why I asked you in the first place.
true. We've certainly seen higher percentage changes on different rates.(What I'm guessing this article is talking about with the "largest in history" claim....which you've missed is probably the same claim they made with Clinton when he set those rates....only amplified because there are rabroad
her taxes.
That would be the largest increase in non-inflation adjusted tax revenue in history...which is a stupid stat)
But again, that's a guess, and why I asked you in the first place.
B
ballz2wallz
Guest
Get ready for round two of the Great Recession. With all the data suggesting a near identical repeat of the Great Depression numbers, we could be headed that low.
M
mover
Guest
The budget...well if there actually were one this year...would look much better. But with the massive decline in deficit, the government would then be able to buy rainbows and unicorns for everyone, borrowing more money, but with a deficit that is only 95% of what it currently is. Maybe 99.9%. Around there.
3
|3illy the |<
Guest
You made the claim. Yet you can't provide the evidence for that claim.
"because everyone I read says so" is nrabroad
evidence you stupid fuck.
You started the thread.
You titled the thread.
You picked "largest tax increases in history!"
I asked how it was being measured as such....and you can't even explain that.
Are you telling me that if I started a thread entitled "biggest tax breaks in history to be enacted in 6 months!" and then couldn't explain why or how that was true you'd be okay with that?
"because everyone I read says so" is nrabroad
evidence you stupid fuck.
You started the thread.
You titled the thread.
You picked "largest tax increases in history!"
I asked how it was being measured as such....and you can't even explain that.
Are you telling me that if I started a thread entitled "biggest tax breaks in history to be enacted in 6 months!" and then couldn't explain why or how that was true you'd be okay with that?
B
ballz2wallz
Guest
ding ding ding