Journey to the Centre of the Earth 3D

U

Unlimit3d

New member
Anyone been to see it yet?

I want to see this, coz i like Josh Hutcherson - he does some good movies like Bridge to Terabithia, Little Manhattan etc
 
is it out yet?? I didn't think it was for some reason. I think i'm getting it confused with the Mummy 3 cos Frasier kind of merges into one character in my opinion.

Is it likely to be in most cinemas though....you won't have to go to a special 3D screen to watch it right?
 
I think it opens today in Cineworld and Showcase cinemas and you can watch it in 3D in them if they have the technology which I think most do, you don't have to go to a special Imax cinema or anything.
 
I saw this yesterday. There wasn't anything 3D about it (?). Josh Hutcherson was cool - I was surprised to discover that he's still only 15. He's already got a nice deep voice.
 
did you see the flat screen version then?:confused::confused:


really like dit thought wiht it bieng 100 degrees not sure if it was a bit far fetched but great popcorn fare.

the 3 D effects were brill:):):)
 
I suppose I must have done, because I didn't notice any 3D stuff and we weren't given coloured plastic viewy things or anything. Presumably it's only 3D in some cinemas but not all.
 
Best 3D I've seen in a long while,
especially that tape measure!
:D

Film did what it intended and had a few good laughs in it too, I was pleasantly surprised!
 
I took my sister and her kiRAB to see this. It was good.

Some of the 3D bits we were :eek: at were :

him spitting the water down the sink, the fluffy fairy things the woman blew on that plant floating out and the piranha

to name but a few. I saw Beowolf 3D too when that was out and I have to say the 3D on that was better, it was more atmospheric and about the scenery, going over the snowy mountains etc was just fantastic escapism.

I'll have to go to an IMAX theatre one day to check their 3D films out. One question I have about 3D films though is, how come I've read snippets about films being redone in 3D, not remade but already existing films being 3D-ised. Doesn't a film have to be shot in a certain way in the first place for it to be in 3D?

Sorry, there's probably no one who can answer my question unless you're a film maker.
 
Basically the real 3D thing works by showing a polarised image alternating between the eyes, one frame for left eye quickly followed by one frame for right and so on which is filtered by the glasses and creates the 3D illusion.

All they have to do to an old film, is render each frame with this polarising technique, (I assume in a similar way to how they remaster old films to improve the quality) to make them appear 3D.

I saw The Nightmare before Christmas ...er.... before Christmas last year and it looked pretty good, to be honest though, in comparison to a film that was intended to be 3D with specific jump out of the screen effects like Journey to the Center of the Earth, it is nowhere near as good.
 
Right, thanks. It's amazing how they can go back and do this stuff.

Funnily, I took my glasses off during Beowolf to have a look at the screen and you could tell that there were two images over each other slighty squewhiff (sp?) but during Journey when I removed my glasses it was only slightly asqew (sp again soz) and you could have actually watched the film in 2D. Developments in technology I suppose.

Both films were Real3D by the way. I should have taken the glasses I got the first time with me (I kept them) because you had to pay more for them.
 
Back
Top