Frankenstien
New member
where's the fun at Des Moines? :eyebrows:Dammit Albo, you weren't supposed to tell people about that night in Des Moines
Is Trading BAD?
- Thread starter msquire98
- Start date
are you fucking serious!? :blink:
if you really believe this Albo Da Kid, then you're more moronic than i had thought you actually were..:slap::slap:
xXxAnonymousxXx
New member
even dancing with men ? :blink:
jay_naguit
New member
lollage.
But man enough to cast aspersions on others behind the guise of self-protection? Including but not limited to posting other nicks of people you think you know something about. So, basically, you are saying that you're better than everyone else? Hell, I'm man enough to give out my other BT nicks, where's your bravado that you display so vigorously in your posts here?
If you think that I am so petty that I would even bother trying to global ban you, then you only prove my point that you don't know anything about me.
christinaaaa123
New member
Webster's definition of "snitch" here .
It is apparent that you are trying to use the word as a noun.
The accurate use of the word "snitch" has to do with someone who is working with the authorities with the pretension that he/she is one of the law breakers. The informant, or "snitch" then turns on his partners in the crime and receives a lesser sentence, or is not charged by those authorities. There is also the situation where someone was initially party to the "act" and turns on his/her partners after the fact.
I certainly was not a co-conspirator in your act(s) of maliciousness.
According to your misplaced definition, anyone who witnesses a crime, or other unjust act, and then reports it, is a "snitch". Hopefully, you can see how this would be counter-productive to a civilized society.
If anything, you can call me a "concerned citizen". :01:
It is apparent that you are trying to use the word as a noun.
Webster (not the cute kid played by Emmanuel Lewis) said:
The accurate use of the word "snitch" has to do with someone who is working with the authorities with the pretension that he/she is one of the law breakers. The informant, or "snitch" then turns on his partners in the crime and receives a lesser sentence, or is not charged by those authorities. There is also the situation where someone was initially party to the "act" and turns on his/her partners after the fact.
I certainly was not a co-conspirator in your act(s) of maliciousness.
According to your misplaced definition, anyone who witnesses a crime, or other unjust act, and then reports it, is a "snitch". Hopefully, you can see how this would be counter-productive to a civilized society.
If anything, you can call me a "concerned citizen". :01:
BRo this is just awesome .. I think this is as relevant to Bit Torrent as The theory of relativity is to Physics ..GiveAway = is a one way communication. i.e. people giving out trackers to those in need of it.
Request = is a one way communication i.e. people asking tracker for their needs.
So Combine both GiveAway+Request = Trading.
Trading = Two way communication where communication occurs from both side and both may be in need of it or may not.
All these three have their own advantages and disadvantages.
In brief both are same, only we people are *U*ked up. and start taking one side or other side. Nothing is bad or good mate. If u want something then It doesn't matter whether its right or wrong. No one is :ghostface Saint.
Well done ... I just hope you dont die early like all the other prodigies as evident from the history..
I do understand that, but the thing is you don't have to suck dick. You should be able to get into those sites by just being yourself. I'm not talking about FST, that's for sure.
Intr4ni1t, dont argue with them. I can't believe that it's been so many years and still a person's honesty is measured by their trading status
Tell him that you traded. who gives a fuk. give him the satisfaction
Brian, you should show who you are and have a balanced argument. Whatever happens you dont have to worrya bout any of your accounts being disabled
Tell him that you traded. who gives a fuk. give him the satisfaction
Brian, you should show who you are and have a balanced argument. Whatever happens you dont have to worrya bout any of your accounts being disabled
choirnerd93
New member
Like I said I'm not going to hunt him down, though I could, I really just can't be bothered. It would be interesting though to see if he'd man-up and live up to his words or just talk shit behind a dupe nick. I'm not really expecting anything I just think it's hard to take him seriously if he doesn't live up to his words with action.
One part bowling, two parts corn meal, and 20 parts jager-bombs. It'll make any city fun
Bunniculette
New member
what a piece of shit user, BrianH. Grow some balls.
Yes and you have just demonstrated your maturity .:ermm:
Btw I don't agree with the reasoning behind Albo getting tossed from FSC . Not allowing him access would have been acceptable but you don't take away something already given without valid reason.
Well, you've got a point there. Tbh, I was one of them a little over a year ago. It's just that I didn't resort to trading, I just figured I'd never get into tracker with invite systems that aren't open signup.
I'm not saying I don't understand them either. That doesn't change the fact that staRAB don't like them trading, though.
