Marvin the Martian
New member
If on the on the one hand, one requires that for something to be true, it must be confirmed by the "scientific method" as well as being subject to laboratory confirmation, whilst on the other, it is intuitive and in some ways, "a priori" (known beforehand)?
If the two schools-of-thought use different methods to confirm what is true, then how exactly, and to what purpose, can debate between Atheists and Theists occur?
If the two schools-of-thought use different methods to confirm what is true, then how exactly, and to what purpose, can debate between Atheists and Theists occur?