C
catweazle
Guest
...in the lesser teams car....? i think it would be a greater examination of each drivers skill to see how he performed in both top and bottom quality cars.
i think its very boring seeing a race where you know 14 out of 18 drivers dont have a hope...not because of a lack of skill..but simply because theyr driving a comparatively crummy car.
also what about staggering the start, so each car sets off three seconds after the previous one [-with the difference re-balanced at the first compulsory pit stop or stop-go style stationary stop-]...with the slowest qualifier going first and the fastest qualifier setting off last! - so that instead of the fastest cars immediately zooming off into the distance and the field stringing out....the slower cars --though starting earlier-- are immediately being challenged and overtaken by the faster cars behind them ---thereby making the faster cars have to work through the field before they get to lead the race.
what other ideas do you have to get all the cars "active and inolved" instead of three quarters of the cars being merely ornaments in the race?
who would be 1-2-3-4 in the final standings, if this was the state of play after the final race 2009?
massa.....111 pts [4 wins]
hamilton..105 pts [2 wins]
raikonen..103 pts [1 wins]
button........80 pts [3 wins]
obviously massa wins, but after thats determined, who finishes2,3,4?
does button finish second merely by winning more races than the others, or does points determine everything After 1st place?
i think its very boring seeing a race where you know 14 out of 18 drivers dont have a hope...not because of a lack of skill..but simply because theyr driving a comparatively crummy car.
also what about staggering the start, so each car sets off three seconds after the previous one [-with the difference re-balanced at the first compulsory pit stop or stop-go style stationary stop-]...with the slowest qualifier going first and the fastest qualifier setting off last! - so that instead of the fastest cars immediately zooming off into the distance and the field stringing out....the slower cars --though starting earlier-- are immediately being challenged and overtaken by the faster cars behind them ---thereby making the faster cars have to work through the field before they get to lead the race.
what other ideas do you have to get all the cars "active and inolved" instead of three quarters of the cars being merely ornaments in the race?
who would be 1-2-3-4 in the final standings, if this was the state of play after the final race 2009?
massa.....111 pts [4 wins]
hamilton..105 pts [2 wins]
raikonen..103 pts [1 wins]
button........80 pts [3 wins]
obviously massa wins, but after thats determined, who finishes2,3,4?
does button finish second merely by winning more races than the others, or does points determine everything After 1st place?