Is there a pundit or politician you oppose, but think would tough to debate?

F

Flywheel

New member
That is, someone who who think is wrong, but would be a tough person to debate in a neutral forum?

I'm a liberal, but I think Karl Rove and Grover Norquist are pretty bright guys, and I'd I'd be sweating bricks if I had to debate them, even under the most academically rigid circumstances.
 
Olberman would be a tough cookie because he's very cautious. Honestly, he talks like a politician does, he should be Barry's Press Secretary, he would fit the mold perfectly.

I'd wipe the floor with Maddow.

Rove is a good choice, I don't particularly care for him but he is a smart man who chooses his words and thoughts wisely.
 
On the conservative side, I think that a debate with Christopher Hitchens would be very difficult. That man has made a career out of debating people, and he seems to be very good at using a person's own words against them.

On the liberal side, I'd be weary about debating Chris Matthews. He has a very deep knowledge of history, and I've noticed that he likes to draw on historical examples to back up his arguments, examples that I probably wouldn't have thought of on my own.
 
Back
Top