Is the media drawing back coverage of the swine flu because people aren't buying it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Barracuda
  • Start date Start date
B

Barracuda

Guest
In my local newspaper, 60% of people thought the swine flu wasn't going to become a dangerous epidemic. People have been making jokes about it all over the internet and not taking it seriously.

All of a sudden today, I notice the coverage has been drawn back CONSIDERABLY. Apparently, an ice shelf the size of New York City and an Obama press conference have become more important, along with the Craigslist killer's sexual preferences.

I see it's still being covered on CNN and Fox, but they've kind of got the second-rate people doing it. I don't think we'll be hearing about it tomorrow.
 
The fact that people aren't buying it is a GREAT thing. The will surely halt the New World Order in it's tracks for the time being. Martial Law is now out of the picture for now and America's citizens bought a lot of time.
 
Similar to the swine flu scare of 1976. I was in the military at that time and we were made to get a swine flu shot which caused more problems than the flu itself.
 
Back
Top