Is reforming the laws to have logical reasoning and disgarding religious reasoning

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nothing
  • Start date Start date
N

Nothing

Guest
unrealistic? someone says it is unrealistic but I do not see how. For instance reforming marriage laws to be the right of "any two consenting adults regardless of race or gender" I do not think that is "unrealistic" I feel it is more "realistic" and progressive.
So reforming laws based on religion to base them on logic and good morale.
What do you think?
Well I am sure a 3 year old child is not consenting so that is "illogical" and is force not consenting.
Well many religious text speak of girls that young marrying so the age restraint is obviously not based on religion but knowledge gained about levels of maturity through psychology. Yes logic not religion.
 
You can reform the law whenever a majority want to reform the law. You will never realistically make people stop thinking about their religion. You can only ASK them to think logically and you can ASK them to change their opinion about whether homsexuality is a choice and/or is immoral. FYI, not all religious people believe that homosexuality is a choice, that it is immoral, and are completely supportive of gay equality in every way.
 
Back
Top