was glossed over by the? press. I mean, regardless of the outcome, isnt it odd that people who wonder why that little tidbit wasnt included are hushed as being silly or narrow minded?
Isnt it akin to a judge who owns hundreds of acres in farms and reverses the will of the people in a vote re: farming?
Thoughts?
Please understand while I dont agree with any judge overturning the peoples vote, I could care less if the man is gay or what he personally felt on this issue. Im just wondering why it wasnt even included considering that is journalistic worthy even if it isnt worthy in the execution of his decision, Get it?
Isnt it akin to a judge who owns hundreds of acres in farms and reverses the will of the people in a vote re: farming?
Thoughts?
Please understand while I dont agree with any judge overturning the peoples vote, I could care less if the man is gay or what he personally felt on this issue. Im just wondering why it wasnt even included considering that is journalistic worthy even if it isnt worthy in the execution of his decision, Get it?