Is it odd that republicans first blamed Clinton for the financial crisis and

olin h

New member
now blame Obama but skipped Bush? seems like there is contradiction in what they think and how much time it takes to influence the economy
The democrats didn't pass anything Bush vetoed almost everything
there are some quite realist -- I am not talking to them
vic a true conservative those are the colors I hear on Y!A
Your stats are skewed in the usual republican way if they are right -- in 6 years in vetoed 0 bills and in 2 the vetoed the rest which is the most in 2 years -- your number I would have to look up to see if it is right though
 
Yeah, look in your back yard, buddy. The difference is that Bush never did blame Clinton, but Obama can't get off the issue. So who's the coward here?
Besides... Bush's rate went up, not down in the first 100 days of his term.
If it weren't for the libs bashing he would have finished gloriously.
 
Is it odd that liberals choose to ignore the multitude of conservative republicans who are glad lay the blame at the feet of Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama.....

Stop living in your political vacuum


"Bush vetoed almost everything"?????? Really? Bush Vetoed 11 bills in 8 years.... the lowest number since Harding..... get your facts straight.
 
No, why would someone blame their own party? It doesnt seem odd to me at all that people are loyal to their political parties. Liberals are the same way.
 
The financial crisis was on a down-turn at the end of the Clinton administration. Bush inherited it and 9/11 on TOP OF IT and stayed afloat. When it really started going to h@ll is when the Dems took the congress!
 
The economy was doing very well under Bush, at least until the Democrats took over the Congress in 2006.
 
This is the stupidest thing I've read in quite a while

ALL republican blame Clinton. Now, we blame Obama for doing the EXACT OPPOSITE of what he should be doing & for trying to make the country socialist.

Nice try. Get your facts straight.
 
Hmm wonder why they would do that? cause obviously clinton and obama suck. bush wasnt as bad as everyone was saying, he did OK, but not as bad as barack HUSSEIN obama. For crying out loud, obama has spent more money in four months than bush did in 8 years...doesnt that tell you something? hillary is mean to everybody, she's just like nancy pelosi, who cant even say something clear, obama doesnt speak with his real words, he never does! when he moves his head from left to right, he's reading the telepromtor, he's hypnotizing everyone-literally. Face it, obama's CHANGE is not happening. What change has he done so far? And by the way: barely any democrats can face the truth that they might be wrong. Republicans can actually admit that they are wrong sometimes ( usually not) but democrats always have to be right when they aren't even right! does this answer your question? (democrats want to look good, republicans want to help the usa. It's a fact, but you probably can't admit it..... that you might be wrong sometimes, and the Republicans may actually be right. )
 
Back
Top