Is it legitemate for Israel to use massive military force to teach the people of Gaza...

Timmy!

New member
...to vote the right way? It seems that the IDF and their various massacres appear to be using blunt force as a means to "teach" the population of Gaza to not vote Hamas. Is this a legitemate method of education, the mass targeting of civilians?
ori c; as I remember, it was the USA & UK who headed the calls for Serbia to be bombed, for massacres that were subsequently shown to never have happened. The Serbs & Kosovars had been slaughtering eachother in equal numbers. The USA got what it wanted afterwards, a base in Kosovo (Camp Bondsteel), which Serbia would never have allowed. Also, I speak some Farsi-Ahmadinejad was paraphrasing Khomeini in a speech, and he DID NOT say anything even remotely like to the effect that he wanted Israel wiped off the map. Before you lecture me on history, get your facts straight; and also don't parrot whatever drivel you may have heard from Fox news.
 
2 things:

-When Israel signed the peace treaty with Egypt and returned much land taken while defending themselves, Egypt did not want Gaza back, so Israel is stuck with it.

-If Israel really wanted to punish or coerce the people in Gaza, all it would have to do is cut off the electricity, water and food, most of which is supplied by Israel.

Here's a thought: If Gaza stopped trying to destroy Israel, maybe they would all get along better.
 
A short historical reminder. This time we won’t say a word about Muslims that butcher Muslims. We got used to it. The Muslims, especially in the eyes of the Left, are the retarded kids of the world. From them there is no need to demand responsibility, morale, international law. They are allowed.

This time we will deal with the West. We won’t head as far as the bombing of Dresden. We’ll go to recent history. It happened in 1999. Just 7 years ago. Milosevic irritated the Free World when he tried to take control of Kosovo. NATO started bombing. Following is an incomplete list of the injuries. Just of civilian ones.

On April 12th – 12 killed in a bombing of a civilian train; on April 14th – 70 refugees are killed in a “hunt after warriors”. NATO forces admit that they find it hard to estimate the number of casualties; Apri 27th – 16 civilians are killed. Two missiles diverted from their course; April 28th – A stray missile reaches a peaceful neighborhood in Sophia, capital of Bulgaria. May 1st – 27 killed in a bombing of a bus on a bridge in Belgrade. According to other claims 47 were killed. All of them civilians; May
6th – 15 civilians are killed in the town of Nis in Yugoslavia; on May 7th – the Chinese embassy in Belgrade is erroneously bombed. 3 civilians were killed; May 13th – at least 100 civilians are killed in the village of Korisa. Burnt bodies of kids are presented in the world media. NATO’s spokesman announces that the bombings were against “legitimate military targets”. May 19th – NATO airplanes are bombing the Belgrade hospital. At least 3 patients end their lives; May 30th – 11 civilians are killed in the bombing of a bridge. They were on their way to the local market. On the same day the NATO bombers manage to bomb an old age home, causing the death of 20 of its residents; on May 31st another 11 civilians are killed in a bombing.

NATO, by the way, spread leaflets telling the civilians that bridges are about to be bombed. Obviously that didn’t help. Does this reminds something to somebody? There was a general sorrow for hurting innocents, but nobody dreamt of a cease fire. The bombings continued. It took months. Not days or weeks. The determination proved itself. Milosovic was forced to accept the international terms.





We’ve been in this situation before



Let’s continue to November 2004. The Ivory Coast Air Force attacked rebel concentrations. Since when does anybody count black people at all? That’s it, to the bombers’ bad luck 9 French were killed by accident. Soldiers. Not civilians. The French were angry. So angry that they wiped out the entire Ivory Coat Air Force and took control of the country’s airport. And that was only the beginning. When it was the natives’ turn to get angry, the French were sure to enforce order in a very aggressive way, which included killing 27 protesters.

Now let’s go back and discuss the proportions. Milosovic didn’t announce that he intends to destroy all of Europe. The Ivory Coast didn’t announce that its intention is to destroy France. And yet, the reactions of NATO and French were harsh and hard. The Security Council did not call for a cease fire. Au contraire. It was obvious that it’s necessary to get rid of the bad guy in the story. It took a lot of time. In the end he had to bend.

We should be sorry for every innocent that gets hurt. The question is whether somebody has invented a formula in which it’s possible to battle evil without hurting the innocents. In NATO they didn’t find that formula. In France neither. When we get to Israel the rules are being changed. Israel is required to restrain itself. Why? After all Nasrallah is much more dangerous than Milosovic. The Hezbollah is not a guerilla organization. It’s an organization that possesses long-range missiles. In normal countries the state has an army. In the case of Lebanon, Hezbollah has a state. The Hezbollah controls Lebanon and Iran controls the Hezbollah. And also develops nuclear weapons, and also announces that it wants to wipe Israel off the map.

These are just declarations, the members of the Evil Front will tell us, the stupidity and reconciliation, those signed on various petitions. If we will just turn over the second cheek, Ahmandinejad and Nasrallah will send us flowers.

We’ve been in this situation before. We have the right to prevent it from recurring.
 
The Israelis are wrong for invading Palestine and turning the Palestinians into second-class citizens. However, the Palestinians are equally wrong for using terrorism to express their discontent. Now there are so many fanatics that Israel will never get rid of them. They made their bed, and now they both get to lay in it. If two peoples were ever made for each other, they're it...
 
Back
Top