Is Hillary Clinton going to carry on the Bush Doctrine?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chado Y
  • Start date Start date
C

Chado Y

Guest
enough about her staff and personal relation to barack obama. she should let out what her thoughts on the war againt terror are.what do you think she's gonna do?
 
I htink she will make Bush look like a pussy cat, Hillary can play harder than him cause she won't be accused of being a racist and/or a war monger at every turn.
 
she could not be further from Bush. she considers Bush a Moron and is likely to remind him at every turn that Yale has not beaten Harvard in football in over 25 years ... and when they did, they paid the refs.hillary is close to India which makes her Not close to the Arab world. that is not good for Obama if he tries to narrow the gap. But I am certain that she will not play the same strength card as Bush. I am also certain that she is not going to get the same respect around the world as Condie. I feel bad for Hillary because i think she will reach frustration quickly. I do not see her in that post for too long.
 
No. Pre-emptive war is against Obama's policies and against Hillary's stated foreign policy.
 
Although I am sure that Hillary's personal opinion on the war on terror somewhat differs from that of Obama, he is the one in the drivers seat and he will give the orders. She took the job because she wanted to have a high profile job...nothing more.
 
Really wasn't mush difference between the Clinton's and Bush's during the 20 year dynasty. And since Obama's cabinet and staff is littered with their former members, don't see much change from what we have had. Just playing musical chairs every 8 years now.
 
Have you not listened to anything she's said in the Senate or while she was campaigning? No she isn't going to do anything that Bush was trying to do. Gitmo is closing in a year (I'll believe it when I see it) even though it isn't that easy to do. I guess we'll have to prepare to have terrorists living in our prisons off our tax dollars. They are already planning the withdrawal of troops, etc. But that isn't the Secretary of State's job in the first place. She is mostly a liaison between the President and foreign countries. She has no power when it comes to waging war or anything to do with terrorism. That is with the NSA, FBI, CIA, Military, Pres and staff; they are the ones that will have the final say. Actually that is the way it is supposed to be. Instead we'll have congress and the VP telling him what to do.
 
Back
Top