I happen to love the method of creating art, and most digital photograpy seems to just not have it for me. A darkroom, chemicals, and a long strip of 35mm is what I want.
But I want to hear both sides. Give me your best arguement. Is digital photgraphy art? Is it a means to an end? Did it kill film? Is there any other way to do photographic art these days?
And if you side with me: what makes standard photography so special anyway? By the time it reaches product stage, what does it do that digital photography can't?
But I want to hear both sides. Give me your best arguement. Is digital photgraphy art? Is it a means to an end? Did it kill film? Is there any other way to do photographic art these days?
And if you side with me: what makes standard photography so special anyway? By the time it reaches product stage, what does it do that digital photography can't?