Am I the only one that finds Nokia is putting out phones with very inconsistent specs? For example, what I'd like is a mid-range phone that has a headphone jack for decent mp3 playback, wi-fi for web browsing, bluetooth, a decent 1-2mpx camera and a small and thin form factor. You'd think one of the million models out there would do that but no. There's the high-end phones that do everything, like the E90 and N95 at $800+, with huge form factors, or there's the low cost phones that have all almost the exact same features like a VGA camera and bluetooth.
Then you come up to the mid-range phones like the 6300 which has a very nice form factor, all the basic features, but no wi-fi. Go one price bracket higher to the 6136: a mid-range phone with wi-fi! But it has no bluetooth and is using the most crappy screen ever... wtf! It's like there is no continuity in the features. Why can't you go from each $100 bracket to the next and find more and more feature added? Instead it's like they throw features in and out randomly. Some pretty old phones have wi-fi, yet many modern ones don't. Some 2007 mid-range phones have screens that shouldn't even be used on entry level phones. And how can bluetooth not be present across the board?
Then you come up to the mid-range phones like the 6300 which has a very nice form factor, all the basic features, but no wi-fi. Go one price bracket higher to the 6136: a mid-range phone with wi-fi! But it has no bluetooth and is using the most crappy screen ever... wtf! It's like there is no continuity in the features. Why can't you go from each $100 bracket to the next and find more and more feature added? Instead it's like they throw features in and out randomly. Some pretty old phones have wi-fi, yet many modern ones don't. Some 2007 mid-range phones have screens that shouldn't even be used on entry level phones. And how can bluetooth not be present across the board?